{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44","short_pith_number":"pith:EHZZOCY2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"21f3970b1a52b1647fbb6e2cfbfbf0e73cfdfcb41e783332dad0662dc532fb28","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1601.07551","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Analysis of General Power Counting Rules in Effective Field Theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A.V. Manohar, E.E. Jenkins, L. Merlo, M.B. Gavela","submitted_at":"2016-01-27T21:00:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"We derive the general counting rules for a quantum effective field theory (EFT) in $\\mathsf{d}$ dimensions. The rules are valid for strongly and weakly coupled theories, and predict that all kinetic energy terms are canonically normalized. They determine the energy dependence of scattering cross sections in the range of validity of the EFT expansion. We show that the size of cross sections is controlled by the $\\Lambda$ power counting of EFT, not by chiral counting, even for chiral perturbation theory ($\\chi$PT). The relation between $\\Lambda$ and $f$ is generalized to $\\mathsf{d}$ dimensions."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1601.07551","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2016-01-27T21:00:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b7d9ca2d7d5b36d054c6bb893931dab0a2451f1c9822b20a2a84a411fe676f8d","abstract_canon_sha256":"5117773fbbaa180182e8f57d52ff85a5306bb415f807a00ece8ca806f5c4f45d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:53.796585Z","signature_b64":"PZgcQszN28xNpswnbbFb3b5CDCqF2j/KK+GGHznz+uzX8YvPjAIrnphgmncYtxp4oMRdn/LokTTeVLxnngRpDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"21f3970b1a52b1647fbb6e2cfbfbf0e73cfdfcb41e783332dad0662dc532fb28","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:53.795962Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:53.795962Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Analysis of General Power Counting Rules in Effective Field Theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"A.V. Manohar, E.E. Jenkins, L. Merlo, M.B. Gavela","submitted_at":"2016-01-27T21:00:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"We derive the general counting rules for a quantum effective field theory (EFT) in $\\mathsf{d}$ dimensions. The rules are valid for strongly and weakly coupled theories, and predict that all kinetic energy terms are canonically normalized. They determine the energy dependence of scattering cross sections in the range of validity of the EFT expansion. We show that the size of cross sections is controlled by the $\\Lambda$ power counting of EFT, not by chiral counting, even for chiral perturbation theory ($\\chi$PT). The relation between $\\Lambda$ and $f$ is generalized to $\\mathsf{d}$ dimensions."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1601.07551","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1601.07551","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:53.796055+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1601.07551v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:53.796055+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1601.07551","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:53.796055+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EHZZOCY2KKYW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EHZZOCY2KKYWI753","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EHZZOCY2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:12.583610+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.23410","citing_title":"The Art of Counting: a reappraisal of the HEFT expansion","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.23411","citing_title":"Higgs pair production in gluon fusion to higher orders in Higgs Effective Field Theory","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22608","citing_title":"Recent Developments in SMEFT: Theory, Tools, and Phenomenology","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04152","citing_title":"Consistent Scattering Amplitudes, Yang-Mills, the Higgs Mechanism and the EFTs Beyond","ref_index":98,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EHZZOCY2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EHZZOCY2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1601.07551&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EHZZOCY2KKYWI753NYWPX67Q44/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:53.796055+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:04:53.796055+00:00"}