{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI","short_pith_number":"pith:EJIVJUQC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"225154d20210e105ecd5fc7d08f6976a1ef1419d6697832965157a929598c65d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1704.08464","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Consensus measure of rankings","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Xiaolian Guo, Yi Li, Zhiwei Lin","submitted_at":"2017-04-27T07:58:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"A ranking is an ordered sequence of items, in which an item with higher ranking score is more preferred than the items with lower ranking scores. In many information systems, rankings are widely used to represent the preferences over a set of items or candidates. The consensus measure of rankings is the problem of how to evaluate the degree to which the rankings agree. The consensus measure can be used to evaluate rankings in many information systems, as quite often there is not ground truth available for evaluation.\n  This paper introduces a novel approach for consensus measure of rankings by"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1704.08464","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2017-04-27T07:58:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"48af09d1ae4358299af3957ba62c73dac006150c440af7e73ba001b33a5a46c1","abstract_canon_sha256":"ca532cae658c3143a12e008efd4717d4825206308b87505c8e5292005765a298"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:34:37.245580Z","signature_b64":"8WA9fHYqTOarCCRuu24thjQ0fnGVn0EAeZ3db9wYM70JbZAQcXd1uOxV1ijiFU/XIhFV/30srRqKnOgWEhIUBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"225154d20210e105ecd5fc7d08f6976a1ef1419d6697832965157a929598c65d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:34:37.244944Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:34:37.244944Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Consensus measure of rankings","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Xiaolian Guo, Yi Li, Zhiwei Lin","submitted_at":"2017-04-27T07:58:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"A ranking is an ordered sequence of items, in which an item with higher ranking score is more preferred than the items with lower ranking scores. In many information systems, rankings are widely used to represent the preferences over a set of items or candidates. The consensus measure of rankings is the problem of how to evaluate the degree to which the rankings agree. The consensus measure can be used to evaluate rankings in many information systems, as quite often there is not ground truth available for evaluation.\n  This paper introduces a novel approach for consensus measure of rankings by"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1704.08464","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1704.08464","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:34:37.245046+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1704.08464v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:34:37.245046+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1704.08464","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:34:37.245046+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EJIVJUQCCDQQ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:12.930513+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:12.930513+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EJIVJUQC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:12.930513+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EJIVJUQC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EJIVJUQC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1704.08464&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EJIVJUQCCDQQL3GV7R6QR5UXNI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:34:37.245046+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:34:37.245046+00:00"}