{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ","short_pith_number":"pith:EJNZARR5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"225b90463d6cf22c7e05f720abf1648c0d92dc7b33525abb0b2069c3ffa69c0f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.08150","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Bin Yu, Ilia Azizi, Jakob Heiss, Juraj Bodik","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T20:13:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Accurate uncertainty quantification is critical for reliable predictive modeling. Existing methods typically address either aleatoric uncertainty due to measurement noise or epistemic uncertainty resulting from limited data, but not both in a balanced manner. We propose CLEAR, a calibration method with two distinct parameters, $\\gamma_1$ and $\\gamma_2$, to combine the two uncertainty components and improve the conditional coverage of predictive intervals for regression tasks. CLEAR is compatible with any pair of aleatoric and epistemic estimators; we show how it can be used with (i) quantile r"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.08150","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T20:13:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"0c8994008fbb09db8d617ca786ed7e78e709bd4786616227c0a1564d716e96e5","abstract_canon_sha256":"5e854be170b4de16254167c583eaf1416ff0c23c0618ba2c296f64ea56bff1d4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.767409Z","signature_b64":"Nfpm8yqHBRSMfISU1Yj6Rnb8O8xN4Ms72mJiHOvWqZLWwW+iqrZ0iZLJcfcGdRcnTe5tpxszDHPpSwItQ1FbDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"225b90463d6cf22c7e05f720abf1648c0d92dc7b33525abb0b2069c3ffa69c0f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.765688Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.765688Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CLEAR: Calibrated Learning for Epistemic and Aleatoric Risk","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Bin Yu, Ilia Azizi, Jakob Heiss, Juraj Bodik","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T20:13:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Accurate uncertainty quantification is critical for reliable predictive modeling. Existing methods typically address either aleatoric uncertainty due to measurement noise or epistemic uncertainty resulting from limited data, but not both in a balanced manner. We propose CLEAR, a calibration method with two distinct parameters, $\\gamma_1$ and $\\gamma_2$, to combine the two uncertainty components and improve the conditional coverage of predictive intervals for regression tasks. CLEAR is compatible with any pair of aleatoric and epistemic estimators; we show how it can be used with (i) quantile r"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.08150","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.08150/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.08150","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.766525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.08150v4","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.766525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.08150","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.766525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EJNZARR5NTZC","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.766525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.766525+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EJNZARR5","created_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.766525+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.11824","citing_title":"Theoretical Foundations of Conformal Prediction","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09702","citing_title":"Calibrate, Don't Curate: Label-Efficient Estimation from Noisy LLM Judges","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EJNZARR5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EJNZARR5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.08150&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EJNZARR5NTZCY7QF64QKX4LERQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.766525+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-07T02:18:25.766525+00:00"}