{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN","short_pith_number":"pith:EKKVNZMN","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.12684","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T19:33:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"72ad442ed7f2ab054cf1953df25d10a234f1634f7f5550ae5d1a254a1bc03be4","abstract_canon_sha256":"4596c4afdac08db2cc45041be0ab0a872a85d4a94f3f47bab1190d76c43d8153"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"229556e58d9746095f45918f4b77931b5a73fce8b6b8bc53e195b2871542fd43","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.12684","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.12684","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.12684v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.12684","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EKKVNZMNS5DA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EKKVNZMNS5DASX2F","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EKKVNZMN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.12684","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T19:33:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"72ad442ed7f2ab054cf1953df25d10a234f1634f7f5550ae5d1a254a1bc03be4","abstract_canon_sha256":"4596c4afdac08db2cc45041be0ab0a872a85d4a94f3f47bab1190d76c43d8153"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"229556e58d9746095f45918f4b77931b5a73fce8b6b8bc53e195b2871542fd43","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.954891Z","signature_b64":"fLitx1gifUXUuon2x+F3KV45yARhbcdJqnJRKwY4So1cIPLlmaeHo+EozaftCEKzthsYVcWVlMn+ZRh00dPVBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"229556e58d9746095f45918f4b77931b5a73fce8b6b8bc53e195b2871542fd43","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.953603Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.953603Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.12684","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"h2/L0/NIaGp9AWjoUpJ6M/9Q5D4v3oed3OnQ3eQwR9BWJbLopzx3zr8Fk2L9kw+6/YARGoBxE8voG71Qhv3NAA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-31T11:04:21.675393Z"},"content_sha256":"f055bb616cfd8dd7285b86a58aaebac705150eb2cdef1bc3e39a009055951f57","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:f055bb616cfd8dd7285b86a58aaebac705150eb2cdef1bc3e39a009055951f57"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Visual Aesthetic Benchmark: Can Frontier Models Judge Beauty?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Frontier multimodal models correctly pick both the best and worst image in only 26.5 percent of controlled aesthetic tasks, while human experts reach 68.9 percent.","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Basel Alomair, Bhaskar Ramasubramanian, Chunjiang Liu, Fengqing Jiang, Hang Hua, Kaiyuan Zheng, Luyao Niu, Misha Sra, Radha Poovendran, Xiangliang Zhang, Yichen Feng, Yuanyuan Chen, Yue Huang, Yuetai Li, Zhangchen Xu, Zhengqing Yuan, Zichen Chen","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T19:33:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are now routinely deployed for visual understanding, generation, and curation. A substantial fraction of these applications require an explicit aesthetic judgment. Most existing solutions reduce this judgment to predicting a scalar score for a single image. We first ask whether such scores faithfully capture comparative preference: in a controlled study with eight expert annotators, score-derived rankings align poorly with the same annotators' direct comparisons, while direct ranking yields substantially higher inter-annotator agreement on best- and wor"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"the strongest system identifies both the best and the worst image correctly across three random permutations of the candidate order in only 26.5% of tasks, far below the 68.9% achieved by human experts.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That expert consensus on comparative preference over matched-subject sets constitutes a stable and generalizable ground truth for aesthetic quality, and that the 400 tasks sufficiently represent the space of visual aesthetic judgment.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"The Visual Aesthetic Benchmark shows frontier MLLMs achieve 26.5% accuracy on comparative best/worst image selection versus 68.9% for human experts, with fine-tuning closing some of the gap.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Frontier multimodal models correctly pick both the best and worst image in only 26.5 percent of controlled aesthetic tasks, while human experts reach 68.9 percent.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"eb7511ba51d57b2ec47fad38359ccbf22ef2fc0fca5096d372b25f31b7699881"},"source":{"id":"2605.12684","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"bf05daa8-6afa-40a9-9f54-7e2f4a3807a7","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T20:56:56.884329Z","strongest_claim":"the strongest system identifies both the best and the worst image correctly across three random permutations of the candidate order in only 26.5% of tasks, far below the 68.9% achieved by human experts.","one_line_summary":"The Visual Aesthetic Benchmark shows frontier MLLMs achieve 26.5% accuracy on comparative best/worst image selection versus 68.9% for human experts, with fine-tuning closing some of the gap.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That expert consensus on comparative preference over matched-subject sets constitutes a stable and generalizable ground truth for aesthetic quality, and that the 400 tasks sufficiently represent the space of visual aesthetic judgment.","pith_extraction_headline":"Frontier multimodal models correctly pick both the best and worst image in only 26.5 percent of controlled aesthetic tasks, while human experts reach 68.9 percent."},"references":{"count":60,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Color and Tonal Relationships • Are the color relationships more harmonious or layered? • Is there stronger control over warmth/coolness and light/dark contrast? • Does the work avoid muddiness, dulln","work_id":"282ce443-9a4b-4f6f-b354-e36c2be7afe3","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"• Any contextual or background information beyond what is visible in the image itself","work_id":"c1241d28-3815-44b9-a8d0-ecab1550bc06","ref_index":6,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Color or Tonal Rendering • Is white balance or color temperature more accurate or more intentional? • Are colors or tonal values more consistent and unified? • Does the image avoid unwanted color cast","work_id":"eeb6e634-51b3-488c-b2aa-c2da98510bb3","ref_index":10,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"• Assumptions about shooting difficulty","work_id":"ccad34cd-079b-4bb3-ba50-d6eec3d3ef80","ref_index":12,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":null,"title":"Visual Focus and Information Clarity • Is the visual focal point clearer? • Does the visual flow guide the viewer more effectively? • Is there less visual noise or competition for attention? 22 BakeAI","work_id":"12f321f8-8ca3-473f-948f-88d1dab4e0e3","ref_index":13,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":60,"snapshot_sha256":"4cd11bf38a354767bc67a5037c3dece9f0cd25d3b381f0a1392e8d1412b68f2e","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"bf05daa8-6afa-40a9-9f54-7e2f4a3807a7"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"FoTqWADnjINcxAenD2f08jgSUJHPHJtObV8q5L80JnjbMk8ytjhkCBNet+icbPKEbARkV34DqlZm0An3yeZQAQ==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-31T11:04:21.676535Z"},"content_sha256":"3c3e00bb4408edf88abbd45180d2166bdbc6067f0a6ec2ef8bbdc3af9cb6e529","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:3c3e00bb4408edf88abbd45180d2166bdbc6067f0a6ec2ef8bbdc3af9cb6e529"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-31T11:04:21Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:EKKVNZMNS5DASX2FSGHUW54TDN","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"4596c4afdac08db2cc45041be0ab0a872a85d4a94f3f47bab1190d76c43d8153","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T19:33:28Z","title_canon_sha256":"72ad442ed7f2ab054cf1953df25d10a234f1634f7f5550ae5d1a254a1bc03be4"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.12684","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.12684","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.12684v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.12684","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EKKVNZMNS5DA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EKKVNZMNS5DASX2F","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EKKVNZMN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:3c3e00bb4408edf88abbd45180d2166bdbc6067f0a6ec2ef8bbdc3af9cb6e529","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"the strongest system identifies both the best and the worst image correctly across three random permutations of the candidate order in only 26.5% of tasks, far below the 68.9% achieved by human experts."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That expert consensus on comparative preference over matched-subject sets constitutes a stable and generalizable ground truth for aesthetic quality, and that the 400 tasks sufficiently represent the space of visual aesthetic judgment."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The Visual Aesthetic Benchmark shows frontier MLLMs achieve 26.5% accuracy on comparative best/worst image selection versus 68.9% for human experts, with fine-tuning closing some of the gap."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Frontier multimodal models correctly pick both the best and worst image in only 26.5 percent of controlled aesthetic tasks, while human experts reach 68.9 percent."}],"snapshot_sha256":"eb7511ba51d57b2ec47fad38359ccbf22ef2fc0fca5096d372b25f31b7699881"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are now routinely deployed for visual understanding, generation, and curation. A substantial fraction of these applications require an explicit aesthetic judgment. Most existing solutions reduce this judgment to predicting a scalar score for a single image. We first ask whether such scores faithfully capture comparative preference: in a controlled study with eight expert annotators, score-derived rankings align poorly with the same annotators' direct comparisons, while direct ranking yields substantially higher inter-annotator agreement on best- and wor","authors_text":"Basel Alomair, Bhaskar Ramasubramanian, Chunjiang Liu, Fengqing Jiang, Hang Hua, Kaiyuan Zheng, Luyao Niu, Misha Sra, Radha Poovendran, Xiangliang Zhang, Yichen Feng, Yuanyuan Chen, Yue Huang, Yuetai Li, Zhangchen Xu, Zhengqing Yuan, Zichen Chen","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"headline":"Frontier multimodal models correctly pick both the best and worst image in only 26.5 percent of controlled aesthetic tasks, while human experts reach 68.9 percent.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T19:33:28Z","title":"Visual Aesthetic Benchmark: Can Frontier Models Judge Beauty?"},"references":{"count":60,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":60,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Color and Tonal Relationships • Are the color relationships more harmonious or layered? • Is there stronger control over warmth/coolness and light/dark contrast? • Does the work avoid muddiness, dulln","work_id":"282ce443-9a4b-4f6f-b354-e36c2be7afe3","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":6,"title":"• Any contextual or background information beyond what is visible in the image itself","work_id":"c1241d28-3815-44b9-a8d0-ecab1550bc06","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":10,"title":"Color or Tonal Rendering • Is white balance or color temperature more accurate or more intentional? • Are colors or tonal values more consistent and unified? • Does the image avoid unwanted color cast","work_id":"eeb6e634-51b3-488c-b2aa-c2da98510bb3","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":12,"title":"• Assumptions about shooting difficulty","work_id":"ccad34cd-079b-4bb3-ba50-d6eec3d3ef80","year":null},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":13,"title":"Visual Focus and Information Clarity • Is the visual focal point clearer? • Does the visual flow guide the viewer more effectively? • Is there less visual noise or competition for attention? 22 BakeAI","work_id":"12f321f8-8ca3-473f-948f-88d1dab4e0e3","year":null}],"snapshot_sha256":"4cd11bf38a354767bc67a5037c3dece9f0cd25d3b381f0a1392e8d1412b68f2e"},"source":{"id":"2605.12684","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-14T20:56:56.884329Z","id":"bf05daa8-6afa-40a9-9f54-7e2f4a3807a7","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"The Visual Aesthetic Benchmark shows frontier MLLMs achieve 26.5% accuracy on comparative best/worst image selection versus 68.9% for human experts, with fine-tuning closing some of the gap.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Frontier multimodal models correctly pick both the best and worst image in only 26.5 percent of controlled aesthetic tasks, while human experts reach 68.9 percent.","strongest_claim":"the strongest system identifies both the best and the worst image correctly across three random permutations of the candidate order in only 26.5% of tasks, far below the 68.9% achieved by human experts.","weakest_assumption":"That expert consensus on comparative preference over matched-subject sets constitutes a stable and generalizable ground truth for aesthetic quality, and that the 400 tasks sufficiently represent the space of visual aesthetic judgment."}},"verdict_id":"bf05daa8-6afa-40a9-9f54-7e2f4a3807a7"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:f055bb616cfd8dd7285b86a58aaebac705150eb2cdef1bc3e39a009055951f57","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"4596c4afdac08db2cc45041be0ab0a872a85d4a94f3f47bab1190d76c43d8153","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.HC"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2026-05-12T19:33:28Z","title_canon_sha256":"72ad442ed7f2ab054cf1953df25d10a234f1634f7f5550ae5d1a254a1bc03be4"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.12684","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"229556e58d9746095f45918f4b77931b5a73fce8b6b8bc53e195b2871542fd43","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"229556e58d9746095f45918f4b77931b5a73fce8b6b8bc53e195b2871542fd43","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.953603Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.953603Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"fLitx1gifUXUuon2x+F3KV45yARhbcdJqnJRKwY4So1cIPLlmaeHo+EozaftCEKzthsYVcWVlMn+ZRh00dPVBA==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:49.954891Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.12684","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:f055bb616cfd8dd7285b86a58aaebac705150eb2cdef1bc3e39a009055951f57","sha256:3c3e00bb4408edf88abbd45180d2166bdbc6067f0a6ec2ef8bbdc3af9cb6e529"],"state_sha256":"897798aff320470aae2af63fda38283cf5d2a890616828020e9d1e2c57eda498"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"vwbWclEGSxfRi+BrdBIVGuR+c+Wc0Gpt+jOeha4Z3H36Rs1ZFBe0Co0exen+Jk7KjRrAWVXo3z5P++svJVSfBA==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-31T11:04:21.683440Z","bundle_sha256":"7f62a40229ef091002750988ea19e020040bcbf627692b897abf1e784a71a87a"}}