{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M","short_pith_number":"pith:EOONIJBA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"239cd42420a88cd80e5f9e7faf707bd302317edd229eb8eaaaa7146d1df5716e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.11878","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"From Dissonance to Insights: Dissecting Disagreements in Rationale Construction for Case Outcome Classification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Barbara Plank, Isabella Risini, Matthias Grabmair, Oana Ichim, Shanshan Xu, T.Y.S.S Santosh","submitted_at":"2023-10-18T11:04:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"In legal NLP, Case Outcome Classification (COC) must not only be accurate but also trustworthy and explainable. Existing work in explainable COC has been limited to annotations by a single expert. However, it is well-known that lawyers may disagree in their assessment of case facts. We hence collect a novel dataset RAVE: Rationale Variation in ECHR1, which is obtained from two experts in the domain of international human rights law, for whom we observe weak agreement. We study their disagreements and build a two-level task-independent taxonomy, supplemented with COC-specific subcategories. To "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.11878","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-10-18T11:04:31Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"63be013f9a4435b074451cc038d296f54421793a7c4de103eb40d3f8ed66b6bb","abstract_canon_sha256":"e29d2eb94d8f6afb17fbd8a285362c9d8cb4fe838775449a6df592f6a3f1a2f0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702637Z","signature_b64":"dfbkDM0Y1+n031OepsBAJWRm+o7IfVFwXkYAG4mpLVGB+cGtGNuPK0n3wBtoAsYCLQiiNQh6OBo5WdXO/2s/AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"239cd42420a88cd80e5f9e7faf707bd302317edd229eb8eaaaa7146d1df5716e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702129Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702129Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"From Dissonance to Insights: Dissecting Disagreements in Rationale Construction for Case Outcome Classification","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Barbara Plank, Isabella Risini, Matthias Grabmair, Oana Ichim, Shanshan Xu, T.Y.S.S Santosh","submitted_at":"2023-10-18T11:04:31Z","abstract_excerpt":"In legal NLP, Case Outcome Classification (COC) must not only be accurate but also trustworthy and explainable. Existing work in explainable COC has been limited to annotations by a single expert. However, it is well-known that lawyers may disagree in their assessment of case facts. We hence collect a novel dataset RAVE: Rationale Variation in ECHR1, which is obtained from two experts in the domain of international human rights law, for whom we observe weak agreement. We study their disagreements and build a two-level task-independent taxonomy, supplemented with COC-specific subcategories. To "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.11878","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.11878/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.11878","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.11878v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.11878","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EOONIJBAVCGN","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EOONIJBA","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702194+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EOONIJBA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EOONIJBA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.11878&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EOONIJBAVCGNQDS7TZ7264D32M/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702194+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:49.702194+00:00"}