{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL","short_pith_number":"pith:EORCB5U6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"23a220f69e975f9922fde2b11a11a0caf83a1288665acbc290c3b3cf6d6d82d5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.10659","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"MARRO: Multi-headed Attention for Rhetorical Role Labeling in Legal Documents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Abhijnan Chakraborty, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Paheli Bhattacharya, Purbid Bambroo, Saptarshi Ghosh, Subinay Adhikary","submitted_at":"2025-03-08T08:05:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Identification of rhetorical roles like facts, arguments, and final judgments is central to understanding a legal case document and can lend power to other downstream tasks like legal case summarization and judgment prediction. However, there are several challenges to this task. Legal documents are often unstructured and contain a specialized vocabulary, making it hard for conventional transformer models to understand them. Additionally, these documents run into several pages, which makes it difficult for neural models to capture the entire context at once. Lastly, there is a dearth of annotat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.10659","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-03-08T08:05:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"ffff309f0388668fb2c6afa7c1dd6dc5d3b5ab3bdf8c4f42395abcab250295ab","abstract_canon_sha256":"005ee265663862561ad09cf0e8d4be8629b2d8a82b412aa2e040964491c9b6d2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.223445Z","signature_b64":"Bqu0stMCtRTmHSZ83jGaKWlshpYQtWxCyH1jxso7Ru65tb8ASJ8Ym0AOOIL1OTClr2VGv2O2AW7lYuprSRt3BA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"23a220f69e975f9922fde2b11a11a0caf83a1288665acbc290c3b3cf6d6d82d5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222891Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222891Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"MARRO: Multi-headed Attention for Rhetorical Role Labeling in Legal Documents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Abhijnan Chakraborty, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Paheli Bhattacharya, Purbid Bambroo, Saptarshi Ghosh, Subinay Adhikary","submitted_at":"2025-03-08T08:05:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Identification of rhetorical roles like facts, arguments, and final judgments is central to understanding a legal case document and can lend power to other downstream tasks like legal case summarization and judgment prediction. However, there are several challenges to this task. Legal documents are often unstructured and contain a specialized vocabulary, making it hard for conventional transformer models to understand them. Additionally, these documents run into several pages, which makes it difficult for neural models to capture the entire context at once. Lastly, there is a dearth of annotat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.10659","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.10659/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.10659","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222954+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.10659v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222954+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.10659","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222954+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EORCB5U6S5PZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222954+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EORCB5U6S5PZSIX5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222954+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EORCB5U6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222954+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.02308","citing_title":"Structural Dilemmas and Developmental Pathways of Legal Argument Mining in the Era of Artificial Intelligence","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EORCB5U6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EORCB5U6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.10659&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EORCB5U6S5PZSIX54KYRUENAZL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222954+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:31:03.222954+00:00"}