{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM","short_pith_number":"pith:EQ3WYUPF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"24376c51e56693e5ad752bf7627b367b2d9ab022643c461dcc72eb9cf836b4f7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2601.23132","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Verifiable Manifest Signing and Transparency Enforcement for Secure MCP-Based LLM Pipelines","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Arghavan Moradi Dakhel, Foutse Khomh, Kawser Wazed Nafi, Mohammad Hamdaqa, Saeid Jamshidi","submitted_at":"2026-01-30T16:22:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in tool-driven environments such as healthcare analytics, financial systems, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and multi-agent workflows. Although the Model Context Protocol (MCP) standardizes how LLM applications expose and invoke external tools, its baseline model does not require tool-use manifests to be cryptographically authenticated, freshness-checked, policy-bound, or independently auditable before execution. As a result, MCP pipelines may remain vulnerable to manifest tampering, unauthorized tool invocation, replay of stale req"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2601.23132","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2026-01-30T16:22:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"3235075ff0435708914d53e1de1c78179b786d2ba3fed714119545f2e76e936c","abstract_canon_sha256":"80a0b18f0699d542d6391134259caad54ab6948587538f2c3ed075c187958f38"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830501Z","signature_b64":"HYt4ujLQ0ARgAxM3cYOXsPabCHikNQzv70rDWVPs2+Sw97s3EWFw8X6obYf6FGiFmPYaUcGCJDHpVLjPT4I6AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"24376c51e56693e5ad752bf7627b367b2d9ab022643c461dcc72eb9cf836b4f7","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830010Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830010Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Verifiable Manifest Signing and Transparency Enforcement for Secure MCP-Based LLM Pipelines","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Arghavan Moradi Dakhel, Foutse Khomh, Kawser Wazed Nafi, Mohammad Hamdaqa, Saeid Jamshidi","submitted_at":"2026-01-30T16:22:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in tool-driven environments such as healthcare analytics, financial systems, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and multi-agent workflows. Although the Model Context Protocol (MCP) standardizes how LLM applications expose and invoke external tools, its baseline model does not require tool-use manifests to be cryptographically authenticated, freshness-checked, policy-bound, or independently auditable before execution. As a result, MCP pipelines may remain vulnerable to manifest tampering, unauthorized tool invocation, replay of stale req"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2601.23132","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2601.23132/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2601.23132","created_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830070+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2601.23132v2","created_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830070+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2601.23132","created_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830070+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EQ3WYUPFM2J6","created_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830070+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLV","created_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830070+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EQ3WYUPF","created_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830070+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05969","citing_title":"A Formal Security Framework for MCP-Based AI Agents: Threat Taxonomy, Verification Models, and Defense Mechanisms","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EQ3WYUPF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EQ3WYUPF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2601.23132&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EQ3WYUPFM2J6LLLVFP3WE6ZWPM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830070+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-25T01:17:49.830070+00:00"}