{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6","short_pith_number":"pith:EQALL3IC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2400b5ed02c44bda15e03645d54ffea7a06c505bcbe93801e15c627d4d452a96","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.16604","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Debunking with Dialogue? Exploring AI-Generated Counterspeech to Challenge Conspiracy Theories","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Christina Gottschalk, Helena Mihaljevi\\'c, Mareike Lisker","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T10:32:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Counterspeech is a key strategy against harmful online content, but scaling expert-driven efforts is challenging. Large Language Models (LLMs) present a potential solution, though their use in countering conspiracy theories is under-researched. Unlike for hate speech, no datasets exist that pair conspiracy theory comments with expert-crafted counterspeech. We address this gap by evaluating the ability of GPT-4o, Llama 3, and Mistral to effectively apply counterspeech strategies derived from psychological research provided through structured prompts. Our results show that the models often gener"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.16604","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T10:32:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"f28ed616f5633874a9917695a56fd19d100bdb52a31bb9634cd7cf1786aa77d2","abstract_canon_sha256":"a7503b0a5a7fa89e418202a98896299804104806984b07c299860c40011a79a8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.435192Z","signature_b64":"YQLVqf4OVo8HHPAg1U84re7ApivSSq0XVZmhYzkXU19EXv6OA9BwIzsLPoko8joWTu6c56S0XMFMwPMLHfIqAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2400b5ed02c44bda15e03645d54ffea7a06c505bcbe93801e15c627d4d452a96","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434743Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434743Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Debunking with Dialogue? Exploring AI-Generated Counterspeech to Challenge Conspiracy Theories","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Christina Gottschalk, Helena Mihaljevi\\'c, Mareike Lisker","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T10:32:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Counterspeech is a key strategy against harmful online content, but scaling expert-driven efforts is challenging. Large Language Models (LLMs) present a potential solution, though their use in countering conspiracy theories is under-researched. Unlike for hate speech, no datasets exist that pair conspiracy theory comments with expert-crafted counterspeech. We address this gap by evaluating the ability of GPT-4o, Llama 3, and Mistral to effectively apply counterspeech strategies derived from psychological research provided through structured prompts. Our results show that the models often gener"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.16604","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.16604/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.16604","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.16604v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.16604","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EQALL3ICYRF5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EQALL3ICYRF5UFPA","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434792+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EQALL3IC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434792+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.20468","citing_title":"ConspirED: A Dataset for Cognitive Traits of Conspiracy Theories and Large Language Model Safety","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EQALL3IC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EQALL3IC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.16604&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EQALL3ICYRF5UFPAGZC5KT76U6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434792+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:46:42.434792+00:00"}