{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO","short_pith_number":"pith:ETRIETEW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"24e2824c96a0b5770472ea4a33e19783b8ac92d5f386a10765e64c9cb4c1ea6e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.30405","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Deciding the Common Fragment of CTL with Past and LTL","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.FL"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Angelo Matteo, Dario Della Monica, Fabio Mogavero, Gabriele Puppis, Massimo Benerecetti","submitted_at":"2026-06-29T14:51:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"A central goal of language theory is to compare formalisms by understanding their relative expressive power. One challenging question in this direction is the problem of determining the \\emph{common fragment} of two formalisms $F_1$ and $F_2$, that is, effectively characterise the class $F_1\\cap F_2$ of properties that can be expressed in both formalisms. A question closely related to this is the \\emph{membership problem}, denoted $F_1 \\membership F_2$, which asks whether a property expressed in $F_1$ can be also expressed in $F_2$. These problems become particularly difficult when \\emph{branc"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.30405","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2026-06-29T14:51:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.FL"],"title_canon_sha256":"34ce941fa1ff09239dd8c51e055e94f77b1520910db48ae05f97d685c53e99e4","abstract_canon_sha256":"f82d1af8d98ceecebaf051b1ac85fc6aa98381f04f121577132b136ec508d188"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.994228Z","signature_b64":"DaHvmqpy7K2lTDtfWxLtNssJEdXuD7nsXdrnTJ9bpH30VL+sRNeydeP98Pl+IUR5BbsT3MpV71XDj0r/OJvFBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"24e2824c96a0b5770472ea4a33e19783b8ac92d5f386a10765e64c9cb4c1ea6e","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993752Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993752Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Deciding the Common Fragment of CTL with Past and LTL","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.FL"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Angelo Matteo, Dario Della Monica, Fabio Mogavero, Gabriele Puppis, Massimo Benerecetti","submitted_at":"2026-06-29T14:51:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"A central goal of language theory is to compare formalisms by understanding their relative expressive power. One challenging question in this direction is the problem of determining the \\emph{common fragment} of two formalisms $F_1$ and $F_2$, that is, effectively characterise the class $F_1\\cap F_2$ of properties that can be expressed in both formalisms. A question closely related to this is the \\emph{membership problem}, denoted $F_1 \\membership F_2$, which asks whether a property expressed in $F_1$ can be also expressed in $F_2$. These problems become particularly difficult when \\emph{branc"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.30405","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.30405/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.30405","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993819+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.30405v1","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993819+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.30405","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993819+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ETRIETEWUC2X","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993819+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993819+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ETRIETEW","created_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993819+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ETRIETEW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ETRIETEW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.30405&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ETRIETEWUC2XOBDS5JFDHYMXQO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993819+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-30T02:18:13.993819+00:00"}