{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV","short_pith_number":"pith:EXWUAZ42","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"25ed40679a37d7f60d74fba7e9e92e757fca3234b0f1da504290b3faf47d670f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2404.17218","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Prompting Techniques for Reducing Social Bias in LLMs through System 1 and System 2 Cognitive Processes","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Gene Louis Kim, Mahammed Kamruzzaman","submitted_at":"2024-04-26T07:46:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"Dual process theory posits that human cognition arises via two systems. System 1, which is a quick, emotional, and intuitive process, which is subject to cognitive biases, and System 2, is a slow, onerous, and deliberate process. Prior research in LLMs found that using chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting in LLMs, which has been often compared to System 2 reasoning, can lead to reduced gender bias. Along these lines, we investigate the relationship between bias, CoT prompting, a direct debiasing, and dual process theory modeling in LLMs. We compare zero-shot CoT, debiasing, and dual process theory"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2404.17218","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-04-26T07:46:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"c8c6ac747f49e39a8e99d1ac852424789019e0a72c1f161f8898beda4e4a6e19","abstract_canon_sha256":"bdb97d236d41825935655f8bd8620ca5c8e22a2e7d05602360a40e9f5aa662e5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262805Z","signature_b64":"UP6ZD+XVkyO8h4JCL43sMJQWslEMbLJvCjmjwpD/9EAcF977e0g+Hdtw9fvw8N9e8hHYLx9YiT6kegsYBUtYAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"25ed40679a37d7f60d74fba7e9e92e757fca3234b0f1da504290b3faf47d670f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262302Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262302Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Prompting Techniques for Reducing Social Bias in LLMs through System 1 and System 2 Cognitive Processes","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Gene Louis Kim, Mahammed Kamruzzaman","submitted_at":"2024-04-26T07:46:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"Dual process theory posits that human cognition arises via two systems. System 1, which is a quick, emotional, and intuitive process, which is subject to cognitive biases, and System 2, is a slow, onerous, and deliberate process. Prior research in LLMs found that using chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting in LLMs, which has been often compared to System 2 reasoning, can lead to reduced gender bias. Along these lines, we investigate the relationship between bias, CoT prompting, a direct debiasing, and dual process theory modeling in LLMs. We compare zero-shot CoT, debiasing, and dual process theory"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2404.17218","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2404.17218/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2404.17218","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262371+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2404.17218v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262371+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2404.17218","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262371+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"EXWUAZ42G7L7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262371+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262371+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"EXWUAZ42","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262371+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.09620","citing_title":"LLM Nepotism in Organizational Governance","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.12816","citing_title":"The role of System 1 and System 2 semantic memory structure in human and LLM biases","ref_index":44,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EXWUAZ42"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/EXWUAZ42","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2404.17218&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/EXWUAZ42G7L7MDLU7OT6T2JOOV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262371+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:57:31.262371+00:00"}