{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3","short_pith_number":"pith:F3MD5YF3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2ed83ee0bb9a32e58bcc05e3e9feae6ed9cef098998f9aed196315121aa4f5c0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2510.20722","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Typicality of Contextuality","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Ana Bel\\'en Sainz, Beata Zjawin, David Schmid, John H. Selby, Roberto D. Baldij\\~ao, Vinicius P. Rossi","submitted_at":"2025-10-23T16:39:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Identifying when observed statistics cannot be explained by any reasonable classical model is a central problem in quantum foundations. A principled and universally applicable approach to defining and identifying nonclassicality is given by the notion of generalized noncontextuality. Here, we study the typicality of contextuality -- namely, the likelihood that randomly chosen quantum preparations and measurements produce nonclassical statistics. Using numerical linear programs to test for the existence of a generalized-noncontextual model, we find that contextuality is fairly common: even in e"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2510.20722","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2025-10-23T16:39:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"970fe6b09e304f4cc120fe52aa5d1409ccac24fd221f461dca1e1ad35aa9b682","abstract_canon_sha256":"bc595c7bf0525b31c17d219339e4722640759a0debf2e5d5fbf2204cdb805faa"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.444048Z","signature_b64":"jQsGtYlfj31kNgdWU10OrLppf+Shqd4p7IR4kM1Pe4z/e0/TSD1erZD+KvCCV9M2Xf05IqYveKE5NHKeGbU2Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2ed83ee0bb9a32e58bcc05e3e9feae6ed9cef098998f9aed196315121aa4f5c0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443105Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443105Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Typicality of Contextuality","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Ana Bel\\'en Sainz, Beata Zjawin, David Schmid, John H. Selby, Roberto D. Baldij\\~ao, Vinicius P. Rossi","submitted_at":"2025-10-23T16:39:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Identifying when observed statistics cannot be explained by any reasonable classical model is a central problem in quantum foundations. A principled and universally applicable approach to defining and identifying nonclassicality is given by the notion of generalized noncontextuality. Here, we study the typicality of contextuality -- namely, the likelihood that randomly chosen quantum preparations and measurements produce nonclassical statistics. Using numerical linear programs to test for the existence of a generalized-noncontextual model, we find that contextuality is fairly common: even in e"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2510.20722","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2510.20722/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2510.20722","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443556+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2510.20722v3","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443556+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2510.20722","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443556+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"F3MD5YF3TIZO","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443556+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6M","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443556+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"F3MD5YF3","created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443556+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.24511","citing_title":"How rare are Markovian quantum dynamics?","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07405","citing_title":"Commutativity from a single Bargmann invariant equality","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.14319","citing_title":"Warring Contextualities -- Provably Classical vs Provably Nonclassical","ref_index":81,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F3MD5YF3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F3MD5YF3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2510.20722&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/F3MD5YF3TIZOLC6MAXR6T7VON3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443556+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-14T01:20:47.443556+00:00"}