{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE","short_pith_number":"pith:F4WJ3LTG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2f2c9dae6690d292c45e29f4e83d27b929da4af73d229f2b8065d1f714ae307d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1908.11125","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Probing Representations Learned by Multimodal Recurrent and Transformer Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jind\\v{r}ich Libovick\\'y, Pranava Madhyastha","submitted_at":"2019-08-29T09:47:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent literature shows that large-scale language modeling provides excellent reusable sentence representations with both recurrent and self-attentive architectures. However, there has been less clarity on the commonalities and differences in the representational properties induced by the two architectures. It also has been shown that visual information serves as one of the means for grounding sentence representations. In this paper, we present a meta-study assessing the representational quality of models where the training signal is obtained from different modalities, in particular, language "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1908.11125","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2019-08-29T09:47:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2851bfc9866af65817a843be086294a86989aba513580b1cec3364b73c0cdd34","abstract_canon_sha256":"bedd8461e5d86396a11acb11d984724386848a06edadb3fe536f870827d3385a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816583Z","signature_b64":"Yk/rHT+DiCt1bKAkX8Vd5AOUtYJZvg91C0M6xb9XDsJpGqjMhijJmepZ0p+bewlKK3A4drMkG3U4mjr6aVAyAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2f2c9dae6690d292c45e29f4e83d27b929da4af73d229f2b8065d1f714ae307d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816137Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816137Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Probing Representations Learned by Multimodal Recurrent and Transformer Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jind\\v{r}ich Libovick\\'y, Pranava Madhyastha","submitted_at":"2019-08-29T09:47:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent literature shows that large-scale language modeling provides excellent reusable sentence representations with both recurrent and self-attentive architectures. However, there has been less clarity on the commonalities and differences in the representational properties induced by the two architectures. It also has been shown that visual information serves as one of the means for grounding sentence representations. In this paper, we present a meta-study assessing the representational quality of models where the training signal is obtained from different modalities, in particular, language "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1908.11125","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1908.11125/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1908.11125","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816203+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1908.11125v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816203+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1908.11125","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816203+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"F4WJ3LTGSDJJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816203+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816203+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"F4WJ3LTG","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816203+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.20203","citing_title":"Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation of Czech Sentence Embeddings: Semantic Relevance Doesn't Help with MT Evaluation","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F4WJ3LTG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F4WJ3LTG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1908.11125&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/F4WJ3LTGSDJJFRC6FH2OQPJHXE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816203+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:00:30.816203+00:00"}