{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23","short_pith_number":"pith:F5HJKEAS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2f4e951012ed7511c10a07fec0b52bd6e2f3642377704f332135c875dca3a6d7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.05046","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"What Shapes User Trust in ChatGPT? A Mixed-Methods Study of User Attributes, Trust Dimensions, Task Context, and Societal Perceptions among University Students","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Alexandra Birch, Kadija Bouyzourn","submitted_at":"2025-07-07T14:29:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"This mixed-methods inquiry examined four domains that shape university students' trust in ChatGPT: user attributes, seven delineated trust dimensions, task context, and perceived societal impact. Data were collected through a survey of 115 UK undergraduate and postgraduate students and four complementary semi-structured interviews. Behavioural engagement outweighed demographics: frequent use increased trust, whereas self-reported understanding of large-language-model mechanics reduced it. Among the dimensions, perceived expertise and ethical risk were the strongest predictors of overall trust;"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.05046","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2025-07-07T14:29:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"df0c47d14e44e14b3626e0ba8c47f54ba6fbec085f0105fd475bd3dda98efbf8","abstract_canon_sha256":"6bb33d2af853e6f11555de13785de53319919697eb8aa8ae1962e5015e83eef8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.251174Z","signature_b64":"N/oNKdAH6jvkHg9uNOwn/Ysz0qyTR+KQ2/YX9Jce3hrWyY/pGqJyjfcwKfwstwEZr9tS3bE4s9efoTtFXmRtBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2f4e951012ed7511c10a07fec0b52bd6e2f3642377704f332135c875dca3a6d7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250695Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250695Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"What Shapes User Trust in ChatGPT? A Mixed-Methods Study of User Attributes, Trust Dimensions, Task Context, and Societal Perceptions among University Students","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Alexandra Birch, Kadija Bouyzourn","submitted_at":"2025-07-07T14:29:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"This mixed-methods inquiry examined four domains that shape university students' trust in ChatGPT: user attributes, seven delineated trust dimensions, task context, and perceived societal impact. Data were collected through a survey of 115 UK undergraduate and postgraduate students and four complementary semi-structured interviews. Behavioural engagement outweighed demographics: frequent use increased trust, whereas self-reported understanding of large-language-model mechanics reduced it. Among the dimensions, perceived expertise and ethical risk were the strongest predictors of overall trust;"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.05046","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.05046/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.05046","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250753+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.05046v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250753+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.05046","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250753+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"F5HJKEAS5V2R","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250753+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIK","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250753+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"F5HJKEAS","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250753+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.03671","citing_title":"Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23","json":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F5HJKEAS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F5HJKEAS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.05046&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/F5HJKEAS5V2RDQIKA77MBNJL23/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250753+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:08.250753+00:00"}