{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2011:F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO","short_pith_number":"pith:F5OWGQ7L","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2f5d6343eb0df779aaeb9f4c4922a59bb1575205264343441518b37772f658a7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1101.4750","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Loet Leydesdorff, Ping Zhou","submitted_at":"2011-01-25T09:13:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the case of the scientometric evaluation of multi- or interdisciplinary units one risks to compare apples with oranges: each paper has to be assessed in comparison to an appropriate reference set. We suggest that the set of citing papers can be considered as the relevant representation of the field of impact. In order to normalize for differences in citation behavior among fields, citations can be fractionally counted proportionately to the length of the reference lists in the citing papers. This new method enables us to compare among units with different disciplinary affiliations at the pa"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1101.4750","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2011-01-25T09:13:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3f93c5a71472768675fd8a69db8ce34607315bf8fd111605f768bbcfb55b1a71","abstract_canon_sha256":"d913e0f8a38831b68450d5222180d8145d5ec09903d0ea8d33de4a1280f2264a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T04:30:59.019702Z","signature_b64":"Nh5nB4kIeQUsKRe8KIuC6T2Xf0Cd3Df6oX9XMJP+Eg5MILPTVemp/izJU06QMeDB0F3uK1qRh8cCujsctFOMDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2f5d6343eb0df779aaeb9f4c4922a59bb1575205264343441518b37772f658a7","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T04:30:59.018813Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T04:30:59.018813Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Loet Leydesdorff, Ping Zhou","submitted_at":"2011-01-25T09:13:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the case of the scientometric evaluation of multi- or interdisciplinary units one risks to compare apples with oranges: each paper has to be assessed in comparison to an appropriate reference set. We suggest that the set of citing papers can be considered as the relevant representation of the field of impact. In order to normalize for differences in citation behavior among fields, citations can be fractionally counted proportionately to the length of the reference lists in the citing papers. This new method enables us to compare among units with different disciplinary affiliations at the pa"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1101.4750","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1101.4750","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:30:59.018972+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1101.4750v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:30:59.018972+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1101.4750","created_at":"2026-05-18T04:30:59.018972+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"F5OWGQ7LBX3X","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:28.662955+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXL","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:28.662955+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"F5OWGQ7L","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:28.662955+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO","json":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F5OWGQ7L"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F5OWGQ7L","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1101.4750&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/F5OWGQ7LBX3XTKXLT5GESIVFTO/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T04:30:59.018972+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T04:30:59.018972+00:00"}