{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72","short_pith_number":"pith:F5SLPPK6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2f64b7bd5ea7667d22a641a4f44099fea5f0033e6b7c513ee548ca5cef6941e0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1602.04331","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Generalized roll-call model for the Shapley-Shubik index","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"math.CO","authors_text":"Sascha Kurz","submitted_at":"2016-02-13T13:38:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"In 1996 Dan Felsenthal and Mosh\\'e Machover considered the following model. An assembly consisting of $n$ voters exercises roll-call. All $n!$ possible orders in which the voters may be called are assumed to be equiprobable. The votes of each voter are independent with expectation $0<p<1$ for an individual vote {\\lq\\lq}yea{\\rq\\rq}. For a given decision rule $v$ the \\emph{pivotal} voter in a roll-call is the one whose vote finally decides the aggregated outcome. It turned out that the probability to be pivotal is equivalent to the Shapley-Shubik index. Here we give an easy combinatorial proof o"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1602.04331","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.CO","submitted_at":"2016-02-13T13:38:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"5456fc5a4a160d31dadcf175a4399b0dfe944c44e482c63bd278ba7913582114","abstract_canon_sha256":"0e3dfe03086e798a94ac8a4742d524f1dc81d0c1877c07496f08853640431096"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.824332Z","signature_b64":"yBLZPIBcHZbQw/rsHMYae/KM9ZLDzs33jUZJw2RgtPtCAAZsbeqxgA8zOL5ExHNaTz+UOnFkYcuyaBRpNRynAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2f64b7bd5ea7667d22a641a4f44099fea5f0033e6b7c513ee548ca5cef6941e0","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.823734Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.823734Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Generalized roll-call model for the Shapley-Shubik index","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"math.CO","authors_text":"Sascha Kurz","submitted_at":"2016-02-13T13:38:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"In 1996 Dan Felsenthal and Mosh\\'e Machover considered the following model. An assembly consisting of $n$ voters exercises roll-call. All $n!$ possible orders in which the voters may be called are assumed to be equiprobable. The votes of each voter are independent with expectation $0<p<1$ for an individual vote {\\lq\\lq}yea{\\rq\\rq}. For a given decision rule $v$ the \\emph{pivotal} voter in a roll-call is the one whose vote finally decides the aggregated outcome. It turned out that the probability to be pivotal is equivalent to the Shapley-Shubik index. Here we give an easy combinatorial proof o"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1602.04331","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1602.04331","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.823826+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1602.04331v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.823826+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1602.04331","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.823826+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"F5SLPPK6U5TH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:15.759754+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVG","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:15.759754+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"F5SLPPK6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:15.759754+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.01323","citing_title":"An Axiomatization of the Shapley-Shubik Index for Interval Decisions","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72","json":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F5SLPPK6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F5SLPPK6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1602.04331&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/F5SLPPK6U5TH2IVGIGSPIQEZ72/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.823826+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:08:36.823826+00:00"}