{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL","short_pith_number":"pith:F5VEHUXD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2f6a43d2e31bb591e53813c3b2151a32f491c38ce9cc8b7810c273f9dc86e000","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.16453","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Foliation de Rham cohomology of generic Reeb foliations","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.SG","authors_text":"Yong-Geun Oh","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T06:41:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper, we prove that there exists a residual subset of contact forms $\\lambda$ (if any) on a compact connected orientable manifold $M$ for which the foliation de Rham cohomology of the associated Reeb foliation $F_\\lambda$ is trivial in that both $H^0(F_\\lambda,{\\mathbb R})$ and $H^1(F_\\lambda,{\\mathbb R})$ are isomorphic to $\\mathbb R$. We also prove the same triviality for a generic choice of contact forms with fixed contact structure $\\xi$. For any choice of $\\lambda$ from the aforementioned residual subset, this cohomological result can be restated as any of the following two equiv"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.16453","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.SG","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T06:41:47Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1dd23b0caaaffa14f406254e4170e3680ef7eb0cea48458a7eeb0a30fc4c66cb","abstract_canon_sha256":"925cd072ce15b89ee776b70b20e127f8fccb60712749fb3d40288948c795b7b7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.352195Z","signature_b64":"hHLN/fiVJctxgVfxaYbbsnwnJmBczSAyC3R4Vow/hQkDkydV1AUjGsMOE75qEt/Q9WvBZ8aD3XGvKhHo8p9nDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2f6a43d2e31bb591e53813c3b2151a32f491c38ce9cc8b7810c273f9dc86e000","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351719Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351719Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Foliation de Rham cohomology of generic Reeb foliations","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.SG","authors_text":"Yong-Geun Oh","submitted_at":"2025-04-23T06:41:47Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this paper, we prove that there exists a residual subset of contact forms $\\lambda$ (if any) on a compact connected orientable manifold $M$ for which the foliation de Rham cohomology of the associated Reeb foliation $F_\\lambda$ is trivial in that both $H^0(F_\\lambda,{\\mathbb R})$ and $H^1(F_\\lambda,{\\mathbb R})$ are isomorphic to $\\mathbb R$. We also prove the same triviality for a generic choice of contact forms with fixed contact structure $\\xi$. For any choice of $\\lambda$ from the aforementioned residual subset, this cohomological result can be restated as any of the following two equiv"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.16453","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.16453/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.16453","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351777+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.16453v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351777+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.16453","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351777+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"F5VEHUXDDO2Z","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351777+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351777+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"F5VEHUXD","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351777+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.13234","citing_title":"Quantitative contact Hamiltonian dynamics","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F5VEHUXD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/F5VEHUXD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.16453&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/F5VEHUXDDO2ZDZJYCPB3EFI2GL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351777+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:01:35.351777+00:00"}