{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S","short_pith_number":"pith:FE6DAOGR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"293c3038d120e1068fb6f5f0db2a98dc9f78a43e2ee131c658a225a77a44a848","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2009.04490","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Elastic positivity vs extremal positivity bounds in SMEFT: a case study in transversal electroweak gauge-boson scatterings","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Cen Zhang, Kimiko Yamashita, Shuang-Yong Zhou","submitted_at":"2020-09-09T18:02:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"The positivity bounds, derived from the axiomatic principles of quantum field theory (QFT), constrain the signs of Wilson coefficients and their linear combinations in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). The precise determination of these bounds, however, can become increasingly difficult as more and more SM modes and operators are taken into account. We study two approaches that aim at obtaining the full set of bounds for a given set of SM fields: 1) the traditional elastic positivity approach, which exploits the elastic scattering amplitudes of states with arbitrarily superpos"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2009.04490","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2020-09-09T18:02:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"c020f7e2bb7c874f2beb43b6753ed22402c1af19c5be056a3b1c4711e586ebf1","abstract_canon_sha256":"490a1ffb043f41b1225502e49d857cbca5f72d0dbe6584838a8090b0f7c24651"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268588Z","signature_b64":"P/rLXn1vhVo4Lzmfz0VQYniqn1w62Z1MoeGyB0oE5ikPCDsCyrm92IYECWAOfn++uKqA7M23ct7LfvoFKlOrAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"293c3038d120e1068fb6f5f0db2a98dc9f78a43e2ee131c658a225a77a44a848","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268090Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268090Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Elastic positivity vs extremal positivity bounds in SMEFT: a case study in transversal electroweak gauge-boson scatterings","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Cen Zhang, Kimiko Yamashita, Shuang-Yong Zhou","submitted_at":"2020-09-09T18:02:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"The positivity bounds, derived from the axiomatic principles of quantum field theory (QFT), constrain the signs of Wilson coefficients and their linear combinations in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT). The precise determination of these bounds, however, can become increasingly difficult as more and more SM modes and operators are taken into account. We study two approaches that aim at obtaining the full set of bounds for a given set of SM fields: 1) the traditional elastic positivity approach, which exploits the elastic scattering amplitudes of states with arbitrarily superpos"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2009.04490","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2009.04490/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2009.04490","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2009.04490v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2009.04490","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FE6DAOGREDQQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FE6DAOGREDQQND5W","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268154+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FE6DAOGR","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268154+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.25233","citing_title":"Higgs Scattering and Entanglement in SMEFT","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20319","citing_title":"The Equivalence Principle at High Energies Completes the Spectrum","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.00107","citing_title":"Full positivity bounds for anomalous quartic gauge couplings in SMEFT","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03116","citing_title":"Probing anomalous quartic gauge couplings via vector boson scattering at the same-sign muon collider","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FE6DAOGR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FE6DAOGR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2009.04490&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FE6DAOGREDQQND5W6XYNWKUY3S/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268154+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:12:03.268154+00:00"}