{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN","short_pith_number":"pith:FET72DZN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2927fd0f2d344f1cc65665629bc65b0379868b7b2eb5da5d25a973c4751bdab8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2008.03572","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Respecting One's Fellow: QBism's Analysis of Wigner's Friend","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Christopher A. Fuchs, John B. DeBrota, Ruediger Schack","submitted_at":"2020-08-08T18:33:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"According to QBism, quantum states, unitary evolutions, and measurement operators are all understood as personal judgments of the agent using the formalism. Meanwhile, quantum measurement outcomes are understood as the personal experiences of the same agent. Wigner's conundrum of the friend, in which two agents ostensibly have different accounts of whether or not there is a measurement outcome, thus poses no paradox for QBism. Indeed the resolution of Wigner's original thought experiment was central to the development of QBist thinking. The focus of this paper concerns two very instructive mod"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2008.03572","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2020-08-08T18:33:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3a7d56fb18e6ed31ef3b181037175f3aa8cfdba5f64eb3d6e07c46e438f02080","abstract_canon_sha256":"30f75178ca260a92d17879924d63405adbf5f8d5ba124f109def213fa92b1dd9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.328014Z","signature_b64":"GMMbgOalWSuGYp7Mlw8DiHzsnhEigXQNsXHYTRKKaBd8Yrtj2sHlYfexacHxKeYBuBJAXuew5XDIDFMP8I83AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2927fd0f2d344f1cc65665629bc65b0379868b7b2eb5da5d25a973c4751bdab8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327586Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327586Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Respecting One's Fellow: QBism's Analysis of Wigner's Friend","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Christopher A. Fuchs, John B. DeBrota, Ruediger Schack","submitted_at":"2020-08-08T18:33:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"According to QBism, quantum states, unitary evolutions, and measurement operators are all understood as personal judgments of the agent using the formalism. Meanwhile, quantum measurement outcomes are understood as the personal experiences of the same agent. Wigner's conundrum of the friend, in which two agents ostensibly have different accounts of whether or not there is a measurement outcome, thus poses no paradox for QBism. Indeed the resolution of Wigner's original thought experiment was central to the development of QBist thinking. The focus of this paper concerns two very instructive mod"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2008.03572","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2008.03572/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2008.03572","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327649+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2008.03572v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327649+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2008.03572","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327649+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FET72DZNGRHR","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327649+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FET72DZNGRHRZRSW","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327649+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FET72DZN","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327649+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FET72DZN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FET72DZN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2008.03572&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FET72DZNGRHRZRSWMVRJXRS3AN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327649+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:07:32.327649+00:00"}