{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA","short_pith_number":"pith:FEWCYNZE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"292c2c3724884e7ed1143772c168deb82f0f8f6c7202e3a7ce3fa850fe3dd4f4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.11725","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Revisiting the Langlie procedure","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Dennis Christensen","submitted_at":"2024-07-16T13:43:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Introduced in 1962, the Langlie procedure is one of the most popular approaches to sensitivity testing. It aims to estimate an unknown sensitivity distribution based on the outcomes of binary trials. Officially recognized by the U.S. Department of Defense, the procedure is widely used both in civil and military industry. It first provides an experimental design for how the binary trials should be conducted, and then estimates the sensitivity distribution via maximum likelihood under a simple parametric model like logistic or probit regression. Despite its popularity and longevity, little is kn"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.11725","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2024-07-16T13:43:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"1ef1529433b7256681fdd2438ec7643c559f10de39dff8ee5b9d02e60b5a74f4","abstract_canon_sha256":"5b9a9f10a4a5fbb69667d79c197f78fef09c7cd691fd3a0da5497a5bdabc00f0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089507Z","signature_b64":"RdHruzbqVjVLwoGeQfnN1ZSbm3zhSmjnPJA0oH1w8oBVVu/Hl1jt/O4yQlLEQYFzzMPpSTCd5HzHbtN9uQfrAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"292c2c3724884e7ed1143772c168deb82f0f8f6c7202e3a7ce3fa850fe3dd4f4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089026Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089026Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Revisiting the Langlie procedure","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Dennis Christensen","submitted_at":"2024-07-16T13:43:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Introduced in 1962, the Langlie procedure is one of the most popular approaches to sensitivity testing. It aims to estimate an unknown sensitivity distribution based on the outcomes of binary trials. Officially recognized by the U.S. Department of Defense, the procedure is widely used both in civil and military industry. It first provides an experimental design for how the binary trials should be conducted, and then estimates the sensitivity distribution via maximum likelihood under a simple parametric model like logistic or probit regression. Despite its popularity and longevity, little is kn"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.11725","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.11725/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.11725","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089085+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.11725v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089085+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.11725","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089085+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FEWCYNZERBHH","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089085+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FEWCYNZERBHH5UIU","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089085+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FEWCYNZE","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089085+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FEWCYNZE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FEWCYNZE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.11725&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FEWCYNZERBHH5UIUG5ZMC2G6XA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089085+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:44:40.089085+00:00"}