{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW","short_pith_number":"pith:FEY2NT5K","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2931a6cfaa5f3a02a6c8e7e60279be0daa1f4c03dce1f14fcf0f34c576c92d65","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2006.15682","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Survey on the Evaluation of Clone Detection Performance and Benchmarking","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Chanchal K. Roy, Jeffrey Svajlenko","submitted_at":"2020-06-28T19:16:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"There are a great many clone detection tools proposed in the literature. In this paper, we investigate the state of clone detection tool evaluation. We begin by surveying the clone detection benchmarks, and performing a multi-faceted evaluation and comparison of their features and capabilities. We then survey the existing clone detection tool and technique publications, and evaluate how the authors of these works evaluate their own tools/techniques. We rank the individual works by how well they measure recall, precision, execution time and scalability. We select the works the best evaluate all"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2006.15682","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2020-06-28T19:16:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b7839f085e1498eed904ee41812e6a41aeba19884665a66588a558d0f4b02498","abstract_canon_sha256":"349c4f836e38e9213f2c9d9193601bb13cc0e1bc963064f48f8986829312c2c3"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028714Z","signature_b64":"4l0EiPoA9hrByjKUp5MqxzxB4iut/BDwCNaFV4Lo0jcsdDynFSWEs/FWt7JOP0zQy0D1JOyMjejuYKFg7cGHAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2931a6cfaa5f3a02a6c8e7e60279be0daa1f4c03dce1f14fcf0f34c576c92d65","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028242Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028242Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Survey on the Evaluation of Clone Detection Performance and Benchmarking","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Chanchal K. Roy, Jeffrey Svajlenko","submitted_at":"2020-06-28T19:16:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"There are a great many clone detection tools proposed in the literature. In this paper, we investigate the state of clone detection tool evaluation. We begin by surveying the clone detection benchmarks, and performing a multi-faceted evaluation and comparison of their features and capabilities. We then survey the existing clone detection tool and technique publications, and evaluate how the authors of these works evaluate their own tools/techniques. We rank the individual works by how well they measure recall, precision, execution time and scalability. We select the works the best evaluate all"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2006.15682","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2006.15682/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2006.15682","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2006.15682v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2006.15682","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FEY2NT5KL45A","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FEY2NT5K","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028297+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03048","citing_title":"Combining Static Code Analysis and Large Language Models Improves Correctness and Performance of Algorithm Recognition","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06098","citing_title":"Exploring the Effectiveness of Abstract Syntax Tree Patterns for Algorithm Recognition","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FEY2NT5K"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FEY2NT5K","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2006.15682&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FEY2NT5KL45AFJWI47TAE6N6BW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028297+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:14:08.028297+00:00"}