{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN","short_pith_number":"pith:FFGZ3HUL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"294d9d9e8b7fe1f2dede424dbc9ec3b3797b48800a8645fb5d6702b09ab0265c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.05428","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"An order-theoretic circuit syntax and characterisation of the concept lattice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO","math.CO"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Tein van der Lugt","submitted_at":"2025-07-07T19:18:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We take an order-theoretic approach to circuit (string diagram) syntax, treating a circuit as a partial order with additional input-output structure. We define morphisms between circuits and prove a factorisation theorem showing that these can, in the finite case, be regarded as formalising a notion of syntactical circuit rewrites, with quotient maps in particular corresponding to gate composition. We then consider the connectivity of a circuit, expressed as a binary relation between its inputs and outputs, and characterise the concept lattice from formal concept analysis as the unique smalles"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.05428","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2025-07-07T19:18:37Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LO","math.CO"],"title_canon_sha256":"8c7e9b26c8fd7804c37e8a34654d7b8e8e4bfb60a919888cdef9f5ef925d58c3","abstract_canon_sha256":"03e9641163c382c87956e1e1c66263354e28bac4e337cdddfb07d354e7f2a6a2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210692Z","signature_b64":"PEGrYjlJRPAQtJaZtj2BggUwNQcNRdaNyfJFLWm5V8lffWmgvOcYA4C7RQQ9o1stZMRW/uKwcDQKbjh62HR0DQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"294d9d9e8b7fe1f2dede424dbc9ec3b3797b48800a8645fb5d6702b09ab0265c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210244Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210244Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"An order-theoretic circuit syntax and characterisation of the concept lattice","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LO","math.CO"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Tein van der Lugt","submitted_at":"2025-07-07T19:18:37Z","abstract_excerpt":"We take an order-theoretic approach to circuit (string diagram) syntax, treating a circuit as a partial order with additional input-output structure. We define morphisms between circuits and prove a factorisation theorem showing that these can, in the finite case, be regarded as formalising a notion of syntactical circuit rewrites, with quotient maps in particular corresponding to gate composition. We then consider the connectivity of a circuit, expressed as a binary relation between its inputs and outputs, and characterise the concept lattice from formal concept analysis as the unique smalles"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.05428","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.05428/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.05428","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210300+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.05428v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210300+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.05428","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210300+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FFGZ3HULP7Q7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210300+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210300+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FFGZ3HUL","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210300+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.03132","citing_title":"A missing causal principle: Coordination","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FFGZ3HUL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FFGZ3HUL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.05428&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FFGZ3HULP7Q7FXW6IJG3ZHWDWN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210300+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:33:30.210300+00:00"}