{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT","short_pith_number":"pith:FGDNS34K","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2986d96f8a82fd05f4aee86fb8dda0ccc42828bc48f50fcbc55170f00c9132d4","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2306.11932","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Opportunities and Risks of LLMs for Scalable Deliberation with Polis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.CY","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Christopher T. Small, Colin Megill, Deep Ganguli, Elizabeth Barry, Esin Durmus, Hadjar Homaei, Ivan Vendrov, Julien Cornebise, Ted Suzman","submitted_at":"2023-06-20T22:52:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Polis is a platform that leverages machine intelligence to scale up deliberative processes. In this paper, we explore the opportunities and risks associated with applying Large Language Models (LLMs) towards challenges with facilitating, moderating and summarizing the results of Polis engagements. In particular, we demonstrate with pilot experiments using Anthropic's Claude that LLMs can indeed augment human intelligence to help more efficiently run Polis conversations. In particular, we find that summarization capabilities enable categorically new methods with immense promise to empower the p"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2306.11932","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2023-06-20T22:52:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.CY","cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"7a636211638b1289aab4a1f355367662f4da36b5799481c8c9a2114280e41270","abstract_canon_sha256":"62019c49545f114d073f72f31533b695062eedaf659095ea9dc048c74324e8f0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673594Z","signature_b64":"5VOu5ZEwiOjnzA/kzs3ocCXYzKyRb3GHBI0uPAorOFjQ9naQAONZHWlkSJI9k24Cz5gpCRSDYOBwEDGXkL7mCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2986d96f8a82fd05f4aee86fb8dda0ccc42828bc48f50fcbc55170f00c9132d4","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673145Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673145Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Opportunities and Risks of LLMs for Scalable Deliberation with Polis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.CY","cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Christopher T. Small, Colin Megill, Deep Ganguli, Elizabeth Barry, Esin Durmus, Hadjar Homaei, Ivan Vendrov, Julien Cornebise, Ted Suzman","submitted_at":"2023-06-20T22:52:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Polis is a platform that leverages machine intelligence to scale up deliberative processes. In this paper, we explore the opportunities and risks associated with applying Large Language Models (LLMs) towards challenges with facilitating, moderating and summarizing the results of Polis engagements. In particular, we demonstrate with pilot experiments using Anthropic's Claude that LLMs can indeed augment human intelligence to help more efficiently run Polis conversations. In particular, we find that summarization capabilities enable categorically new methods with immense promise to empower the p"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2306.11932","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2306.11932/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2306.11932","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2306.11932v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2306.11932","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FGDNS34KQL6Q","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673198+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FGDNS34K","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673198+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":11,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26749","citing_title":"Structure Before Collapse: Transient semantic geometry in next-token prediction","ref_index":85,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.02260","citing_title":"Guided Sensemaking: Agents in Collaborative Deliberation","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14097","citing_title":"Real-Time Group Dynamics with LLM Facilitation: Evidence from a Charity Allocation Task","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05937","citing_title":"Large Language Models are Perplexed by some Political Parties","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19521","citing_title":"Efficient Elicitation of Collective Disagreements","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.04588","citing_title":"Question the Questions: Auditing Representation in Online Deliberative Processes","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.07339","citing_title":"Agora: Teaching the Skill of Consensus-Finding with AI Personas Grounded in Human Voice","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14097","citing_title":"Real-Time Group Dynamics with LLM Facilitation: Evidence from a Charity Allocation Task","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08360","citing_title":"Embeddings for Preferences, Not Semantics","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05368","citing_title":"AI and Collective Decisions: Strengthening Legitimacy and Losers' Consent","ref_index":78,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16224","citing_title":"\"Taking Stock at FAccT\": Using Participatory Design to Co-Create a Vision for the Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Community","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FGDNS34K"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FGDNS34K","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2306.11932&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FGDNS34KQL6QL5FO5BX3RXNAZT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673198+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:23:08.673198+00:00"}