{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT","short_pith_number":"pith:FGSB5GUZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"29a41e9a99e30e235665ae0da21d59c4e5414cb3bea57119f5c69926bc2f7a64","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.14425","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When predict can also explain: few-shot prediction to select better neural latents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Kabir Dabholkar, Omri Barak","submitted_at":"2024-05-23T10:48:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Latent variable models serve as powerful tools to infer underlying dynamics from observed neural activity. Ideally, the inferred dynamics should align with true ones. However, due to the absence of ground truth data, prediction benchmarks are often employed as proxies. One widely-used method, $\\textit{co-smoothing}$, involves jointly estimating latent variables and predicting observations along held-out channels to assess model performance. In this study, we reveal the limitations of the co-smoothing prediction framework and propose a remedy. Using a student-teacher setup, we demonstrate that "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.14425","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-05-23T10:48:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"9dc8d8da5e0c67bc8c68405a47147c9e5a0a8ab0c2c6dedbc9f7ce4adc3f51ba","abstract_canon_sha256":"52a09df1c3db1ee86cd4410dcdb2f9e11ac7260f68da388d8401040395d5e766"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714775Z","signature_b64":"Lp9bxKzWgMBfJW6xzMeSVXKJNgsXn/Lwg3Xvu+34jqSG+RLxNrGc8HJoiX0Js+/A/5Y0j77I3k2G1E6RStu8BA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"29a41e9a99e30e235665ae0da21d59c4e5414cb3bea57119f5c69926bc2f7a64","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714285Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714285Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When predict can also explain: few-shot prediction to select better neural latents","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Kabir Dabholkar, Omri Barak","submitted_at":"2024-05-23T10:48:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Latent variable models serve as powerful tools to infer underlying dynamics from observed neural activity. Ideally, the inferred dynamics should align with true ones. However, due to the absence of ground truth data, prediction benchmarks are often employed as proxies. One widely-used method, $\\textit{co-smoothing}$, involves jointly estimating latent variables and predicting observations along held-out channels to assess model performance. In this study, we reveal the limitations of the co-smoothing prediction framework and propose a remedy. Using a student-teacher setup, we demonstrate that "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.14425","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.14425/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.14425","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.14425v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.14425","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FGSB5GUZ4MHC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTF","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714347+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FGSB5GUZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714347+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.18827","citing_title":"OmniMouse: Scaling properties of multi-modal, multi-task Brain Models on 150B Neural Tokens","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FGSB5GUZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FGSB5GUZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.14425&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FGSB5GUZ4MHCGVTFVYG2EHKZYT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714347+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:58:18.714347+00:00"}