{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2","short_pith_number":"pith:FGW47ON7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"29adcfb9bf9c7ab5dec7c20cc8f753ce9cc1011ccf765d76f157ec9891573579","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.12428","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conformity in Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andreas Vlachos, Caiqi Zhang, Nigel Collier, Tom Stafford, Xiaochen Zhu","submitted_at":"2024-10-16T10:16:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"The conformity effect describes the tendency of individuals to align their responses with the majority. Studying this bias in large language models (LLMs) is crucial, as LLMs are increasingly used in various information-seeking and decision-making tasks as conversation partners to improve productivity. Thus, conformity to incorrect responses can compromise their effectiveness. In this paper, we adapt psychological experiments to examine the extent of conformity in popular LLMs. Our findings reveal that all tested models exhibit varying levels of conformity toward the majority, regardless of th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.12428","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-10-16T10:16:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"a7d8defe8b602965bb166f8c41a96d400ef0ebdb04b4c69980bfc6e0f0e88cc5","abstract_canon_sha256":"886a4f3530803db849a3c3b334f0dc341af185920625e61fe6a9fa291a1b5651"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726482Z","signature_b64":"+pGcs1BZWd6jjoZUBoqMKOxJk7kdUTk2sGNVqWd3howPZWbxQMj1WXS10f3F8dvPFOAvb2+qhw+gMInlSphMDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"29adcfb9bf9c7ab5dec7c20cc8f753ce9cc1011ccf765d76f157ec9891573579","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726004Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726004Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conformity in Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andreas Vlachos, Caiqi Zhang, Nigel Collier, Tom Stafford, Xiaochen Zhu","submitted_at":"2024-10-16T10:16:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"The conformity effect describes the tendency of individuals to align their responses with the majority. Studying this bias in large language models (LLMs) is crucial, as LLMs are increasingly used in various information-seeking and decision-making tasks as conversation partners to improve productivity. Thus, conformity to incorrect responses can compromise their effectiveness. In this paper, we adapt psychological experiments to examine the extent of conformity in popular LLMs. Our findings reveal that all tested models exhibit varying levels of conformity toward the majority, regardless of th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.12428","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.12428/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.12428","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726062+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.12428v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726062+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.12428","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726062+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FGW47ON7TR5L","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726062+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FGW47ON7TR5LLXWH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726062+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FGW47ON7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726062+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04987","citing_title":"DeliChess: A Multi-party Dialogue Dataset for Deliberation in Chess Puzzle Solving","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27766","citing_title":"Got a Secret? LLM Agents Can't Keep It: Evaluating Privacy in Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":49,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19301","citing_title":"Large Language Models Exhibit Normative Conformity","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05397","citing_title":"Confidence Should Be Calibrated More Than One Turn Deep","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FGW47ON7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FGW47ON7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.12428&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FGW47ON7TR5LLXWHYIGMR52TZ2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726062+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:01.726062+00:00"}