{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG","short_pith_number":"pith:FITETHI2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2a26499d1a584e064a704b626590a481ba7d96651b5e1fed0593a3751ee34d21","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.16587","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why Thinking Hurts: Diagnosing and Rectifying Linguistic Inertia in Large Language Models for Recommendation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Enhong Chen, Hang Lv, Hao Wang, Luankang Zhang, Mingjia Yin, Wei Guo, Xuyang Zhi, Yonghao Huang, Yuyang Ye","submitted_at":"2026-02-18T16:38:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is widely used to improve LLM performance, and recent foundation recommender models adopt it by generating textual reasoning before predicting target items represented by Semantic IDs (SIDs). However, we observe that enabling thinking mode in models such as OpenOneRec can degrade recommendation quality by up to 25%. We investigate this failure and identify Linguistic Inertia: when a textual CoT segment is inserted before SID generation, the model relies more on natural-language context and less on historical SID evidence. Further analyses show that this effect "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.16587","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2026-02-18T16:38:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4fff907e90f390ba5c765bf625d359f745c7be87961d7ab064be3f74582ba4f5","abstract_canon_sha256":"b521ff4d5376abf25e3a3eb75e28720835951699fff0a5e44dda4bb8776376fc"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871655Z","signature_b64":"FXKc8ZXv5iqk+JtTiUg6ck2Q8PIEniOR9Bnl9leIlacaGrPuM6XW28TwS032v5LCxPm4qzEaWiQgqL0j/LRcBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2a26499d1a584e064a704b626590a481ba7d96651b5e1fed0593a3751ee34d21","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871048Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871048Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why Thinking Hurts: Diagnosing and Rectifying Linguistic Inertia in Large Language Models for Recommendation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Enhong Chen, Hang Lv, Hao Wang, Luankang Zhang, Mingjia Yin, Wei Guo, Xuyang Zhi, Yonghao Huang, Yuyang Ye","submitted_at":"2026-02-18T16:38:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is widely used to improve LLM performance, and recent foundation recommender models adopt it by generating textual reasoning before predicting target items represented by Semantic IDs (SIDs). However, we observe that enabling thinking mode in models such as OpenOneRec can degrade recommendation quality by up to 25%. We investigate this failure and identify Linguistic Inertia: when a textual CoT segment is inserted before SID generation, the model relies more on natural-language context and less on historical SID evidence. Further analyses show that this effect "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.16587","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.16587/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.16587","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871106+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.16587v2","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871106+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.16587","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871106+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FITETHI2LBHA","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871106+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FITETHI2LBHAMSTQ","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871106+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FITETHI2","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871106+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.17648","citing_title":"SAPO: Step-Aligned Policy Optimization for Reasoning-Based Generative Recommendation","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.14930","citing_title":"IE as Cache: Information Extraction Enhanced Agentic Reasoning","ref_index":61,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15621","citing_title":"Rethinking the Necessity of Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation through the Lens of Adaptive Listwise Ranking","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FITETHI2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FITETHI2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.16587&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FITETHI2LBHAMSTQJNRGLEFEQG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871106+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.871106+00:00"}