{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD","short_pith_number":"pith:FIUGKPTL","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2a28653e6b9e422c5f0f5ac2b1884060e8860b43cb3b2476a91de96537256296","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.12370","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AnaloBench: Benchmarking the Identification of Abstract and Long-context Analogies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andrew Wang, Daniel Khashabi, Jacob Choi, Lingfeng Shen, Nicholas Andrews, Shreya Sharma, Vijay Tiyyala, Xiao Ye, Yining Lu","submitted_at":"2024-02-19T18:56:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Humans regularly engage in analogical thinking, relating personal experiences to current situations (X is analogous to Y because of Z). Analogical thinking allows humans to solve problems in creative ways, grasp difficult concepts, and articulate ideas more effectively. Can language models (LMs) do the same? To answer this question, we propose AnaloBench, a benchmark to determine analogical reasoning ability in LMs. Our benchmarking approach focuses on aspects of this ability that are common among humans: (i) recalling related experiences from a large amount of information, and (ii) applying a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.12370","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-02-19T18:56:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"d803f24cbd81eba005d90ef05ac798c73de289acc32ac58bb38845250ba925ae","abstract_canon_sha256":"19a47ba694e3cb5a27db00b1db5e09f1b5cb2b7cebd5a574ef39072516ce7f2c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917904Z","signature_b64":"ZnTlP4epMbdjikJq1rnKjsahlsWU8OfvouuHA/7CXvhKmK343irz1VgajBNtEdaSd4Bp8a+e+iRM+5BD1jenDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2a28653e6b9e422c5f0f5ac2b1884060e8860b43cb3b2476a91de96537256296","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917366Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917366Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AnaloBench: Benchmarking the Identification of Abstract and Long-context Analogies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Andrew Wang, Daniel Khashabi, Jacob Choi, Lingfeng Shen, Nicholas Andrews, Shreya Sharma, Vijay Tiyyala, Xiao Ye, Yining Lu","submitted_at":"2024-02-19T18:56:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"Humans regularly engage in analogical thinking, relating personal experiences to current situations (X is analogous to Y because of Z). Analogical thinking allows humans to solve problems in creative ways, grasp difficult concepts, and articulate ideas more effectively. Can language models (LMs) do the same? To answer this question, we propose AnaloBench, a benchmark to determine analogical reasoning ability in LMs. Our benchmarking approach focuses on aspects of this ability that are common among humans: (i) recalling related experiences from a large amount of information, and (ii) applying a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.12370","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.12370/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.12370","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917435+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.12370v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917435+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.12370","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917435+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FIUGKPTLTZBC","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917435+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYP","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917435+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FIUGKPTL","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917435+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01359","citing_title":"Structural Ranking of the Cognitive Plausibility of Computational Models of Analogy and Metaphors with the Minimal Cognitive Grid","ref_index":273,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FIUGKPTL"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FIUGKPTL","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.12370&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FIUGKPTLTZBCYXYPLLBLDCCAMD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917435+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:15:29.917435+00:00"}