{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2","short_pith_number":"pith:FJMH5F76","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2a587e97fec0d7b4017a9b07f2ed13bea4cdf8eda753fe516450858079281679","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2011.02552","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Re-Assessing the \"Classify and Count\" Quantification Method","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Alejandro Moreo, Fabrizio Sebastiani","submitted_at":"2020-11-04T21:47:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Learning to quantify (a.k.a.\\ quantification) is a task concerned with training unbiased estimators of class prevalence via supervised learning. This task originated with the observation that \"Classify and Count\" (CC), the trivial method of obtaining class prevalence estimates, is often a biased estimator, and thus delivers suboptimal quantification accuracy; following this observation, several methods for learning to quantify have been proposed that have been shown to outperform CC. In this work we contend that previous works have failed to use properly optimised versions of CC. We thus reass"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2011.02552","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2020-11-04T21:47:39Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.IR"],"title_canon_sha256":"a5165348aac25b5b8c7319192436871a758a70b11f29612bd879d2f119fc6c1a","abstract_canon_sha256":"f082160c2011a8e4e96c4c78c81d1b1ff5129b5717edbce9ca4137eb40c31702"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546927Z","signature_b64":"N3ukoWHBPpgUG6RJDbmBjnFPYZgUsSOsFKvdpQzwmupo+/+0ZhVE8PTvfyWAHhWCMHqOIST/8u0qQvgykC1ADA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2a587e97fec0d7b4017a9b07f2ed13bea4cdf8eda753fe516450858079281679","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546501Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546501Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Re-Assessing the \"Classify and Count\" Quantification Method","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.IR"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Alejandro Moreo, Fabrizio Sebastiani","submitted_at":"2020-11-04T21:47:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Learning to quantify (a.k.a.\\ quantification) is a task concerned with training unbiased estimators of class prevalence via supervised learning. This task originated with the observation that \"Classify and Count\" (CC), the trivial method of obtaining class prevalence estimates, is often a biased estimator, and thus delivers suboptimal quantification accuracy; following this observation, several methods for learning to quantify have been proposed that have been shown to outperform CC. In this work we contend that previous works have failed to use properly optimised versions of CC. We thus reass"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2011.02552","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2011.02552/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2011.02552","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546565+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2011.02552v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546565+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2011.02552","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546565+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FJMH5F76YDL3","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546565+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546565+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FJMH5F76","created_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546565+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FJMH5F76"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FJMH5F76","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2011.02552&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FJMH5F76YDL3IAL2TMD7F3ITX2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546565+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T03:15:51.546565+00:00"}