{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD","short_pith_number":"pith:FRDZ5AS5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2c479e825d0d4cfb56d157c01b5dac98c5233fe256c1efda4f9f7dc8b9fc7791","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.09750","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Pinning \"Reflection\" on the Agenda: Investigating Reflection in Human-LLM Co-Creation for Creative Coding","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Anqi Wang, Keqin Jiao, Lei Han, Pan Hui, Xin Tong, Yuanyuan Mao, Yulu Hu, Zhizhuo Yin","submitted_at":"2024-02-15T07:00:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into creative coding, yet how users reflect, and how different co-creation conditions influence reflective behavior, remains underexplored. This study investigates situated, moment-to-moment reflection in creative coding under two prompting strategies: the entire task invocation (T1) and decomposed subtask invocation (T2), to examine their effects on reflective behavior. Our mixed-method results reveal three distinct reflection types and show that T2 encourages more frequent, strategic, and generative reflection, fostering diagnostic rea"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.09750","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-02-15T07:00:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"7309b9a2205d5c79830338d20ad737e89ac6d7ef1d0ed99fe2f5d3723e23b754","abstract_canon_sha256":"6fabf80ffa21111006818ae47669341e314ebbac8787c164b35eba92287b1922"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.761025Z","signature_b64":"i2BZNEF6crL3DzYbV2dWAn/1o1GCFr6E2q6+jL0+sr1vMQZzC27yaKZPP2xbqH+1R3QofFPp2SvegmR2Qyr/DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2c479e825d0d4cfb56d157c01b5dac98c5233fe256c1efda4f9f7dc8b9fc7791","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760543Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760543Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Pinning \"Reflection\" on the Agenda: Investigating Reflection in Human-LLM Co-Creation for Creative Coding","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Anqi Wang, Keqin Jiao, Lei Han, Pan Hui, Xin Tong, Yuanyuan Mao, Yulu Hu, Zhizhuo Yin","submitted_at":"2024-02-15T07:00:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into creative coding, yet how users reflect, and how different co-creation conditions influence reflective behavior, remains underexplored. This study investigates situated, moment-to-moment reflection in creative coding under two prompting strategies: the entire task invocation (T1) and decomposed subtask invocation (T2), to examine their effects on reflective behavior. Our mixed-method results reveal three distinct reflection types and show that T2 encourages more frequent, strategic, and generative reflection, fostering diagnostic rea"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.09750","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.09750/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.09750","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760598+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.09750v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760598+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.09750","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760598+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FRDZ5AS5BVGP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760598+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760598+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FRDZ5AS5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760598+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2410.01026","citing_title":"Understanding the Human-LLM Dynamic: A Literature Survey of LLM Use in Programming Tasks","ref_index":98,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13776","citing_title":"\"Like Taking the Path of Least Resistance\": Exploring the Impact of LLM Interaction on the Creative Process of Programming","ref_index":73,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FRDZ5AS5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FRDZ5AS5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.09750&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FRDZ5AS5BVGPWVWRK7ABWXNMTD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760598+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:48.760598+00:00"}