{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4","short_pith_number":"pith:FSOMUO3R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2c9cca3b71cf8738f9648bf16b07ca873813b299031cbbf8f328330ba280ddce","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1711.01604","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why Bohr was (Mostly) Right","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Jeffrey Bub","submitted_at":"2017-11-05T15:31:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"After a discussion of the Frauchiger-Renner argument that no 'single- world' interpretation of quantum mechanics can be self-consistent, I propose a 'Bohrian' alternative to many-worlds or QBism as the rational option."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1711.01604","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2017-11-05T15:31:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.hist-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"9e4b8a494babf214f4417cf59ef5a5844d7c1eeafd88de5523710d76dc10674e","abstract_canon_sha256":"cedefe1e8140baada156b3282519b8bc42a0d84f13f43faf3fed769175b686e2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:17.321834Z","signature_b64":"+TtkVpgq68w+pUO3iWAvBgOsVV7Xwn1vm/x0rwO9Jdd4UK1twUVol3KLQOwmBUhUmqpRWR8qWKtgLo32jWTdBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2c9cca3b71cf8738f9648bf16b07ca873813b299031cbbf8f328330ba280ddce","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:17.321359Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:17.321359Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why Bohr was (Mostly) Right","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Jeffrey Bub","submitted_at":"2017-11-05T15:31:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"After a discussion of the Frauchiger-Renner argument that no 'single- world' interpretation of quantum mechanics can be self-consistent, I propose a 'Bohrian' alternative to many-worlds or QBism as the rational option."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1711.01604","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1711.01604","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:17.321443+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1711.01604v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:17.321443+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1711.01604","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:17.321443+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FSOMUO3RZ6DT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:15.632608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:15.632608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FSOMUO3R","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:15.632608+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FSOMUO3R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FSOMUO3R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1711.01604&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FSOMUO3RZ6DTR6LERPYWWB6KQ4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:17.321443+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:31:17.321443+00:00"}