{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2002:FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK","short_pith_number":"pith:FXMOWLW7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2dd8eb2edf309a3c3fe8ed49abb5e752b26bd11ba3bb2e288c21ba10d995e24d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"quant-ph/0208076","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Complex Extension of Quantum Mechanics","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Carl M. Bender, Dorje C. Brody, Hugh F. Jones","submitted_at":"2002-08-12T16:57:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is shown that the standard formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of Hermitian Hamiltonians is overly restrictive. A consistent physical theory of quantum mechanics can be built on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but satisfies the less restrictive and more physical condition of space-time reflection symmetry (PT symmetry). Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct to explain experimental data. One might expect that a quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian would violate unitarity. However, if PT symmetry is not spontaneously broken, i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0208076","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2002-08-12T16:57:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"0f360125d8da3da45766d4ae86e864eaccd7be4dc22cb8203237c9b08446905d","abstract_canon_sha256":"fb4270fa688573fc7eddb19fd61d5bf4577cfbf88312393fdc2d7b431e1c7cc7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.687328Z","signature_b64":"nr7+2v/9oc3USWP7Ep0YwAqX3/I6Y0Ho4ArhDWrsds9A6X3x+H+9chucfOKlsHuPze+O4XYP5jDcm50AUtlWAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2dd8eb2edf309a3c3fe8ed49abb5e752b26bd11ba3bb2e288c21ba10d995e24d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686930Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686930Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Complex Extension of Quantum Mechanics","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-th"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Carl M. Bender, Dorje C. Brody, Hugh F. Jones","submitted_at":"2002-08-12T16:57:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is shown that the standard formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of Hermitian Hamiltonians is overly restrictive. A consistent physical theory of quantum mechanics can be built on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but satisfies the less restrictive and more physical condition of space-time reflection symmetry (PT symmetry). Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct to explain experimental data. One might expect that a quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian would violate unitarity. However, if PT symmetry is not spontaneously broken, i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"quant-ph/0208076","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/quant-ph/0208076/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"quant-ph/0208076","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"quant-ph/0208076v2","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0208076","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FXMOWLW7GCND","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FXMOWLW7","created_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686985+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":4,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.13251","citing_title":"Kubo-Martin-Schwinger conditions for non-Hermitian systems","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.31697","citing_title":"Hadronic exceptional points","ref_index":185,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.13251","citing_title":"Kubo-Martin-Schwinger conditions for non-Hermitian systems","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28814","citing_title":"CFT Dual for Timelike Geodesic in Lorentzian dS","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05878","citing_title":"Exact WKB analysis of inverted triple-well: resonance, PT-symmetry breaking, and resurgence","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05878","citing_title":"Exact WKB analysis of inverted triple-well: resonance, PT-symmetry breaking, and resurgence","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FXMOWLW7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FXMOWLW7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=quant-ph/0208076&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FXMOWLW7GCNDYP7I5VE2XNPHKK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686985+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T15:34:29.686985+00:00"}