{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV","short_pith_number":"pith:FXOI7OMI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"2ddc8fb9886f0bc850bf211f3f68683d425b168f73961d9a8ef17c7941e34bac","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1810.08635","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Population and Empirical PR Curves for Assessment of Ranking Algorithms","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Jacqueline M. Hughes-Oliver","submitted_at":"2018-10-19T18:29:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"The ROC curve is widely used to assess the quality of prediction/classification/ranking algorithms, and its properties have been extensively studied. The precision-recall (PR) curve has become the de facto replacement for the ROC curve in the presence of imbalance, namely where one class is far more likely than the other class. While the PR and ROC curves tend to be used interchangeably, they have some very different properties. Properties of the PR curve are the focus of this paper. We consider: (1) population PR curves, where complete distributional assumptions are specified for scores from "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1810.08635","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2018-10-19T18:29:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"cf2608d843c9449a8f07e0326e3b6024d14562720fcab9d03dbba8654b71ed43","abstract_canon_sha256":"298f3e135c03e04c6a6b9fd16ec5e9355c160169ac3e9ea06c29d187e56e1bf4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:43.958189Z","signature_b64":"v7PazAcN8lQSymvqYOiedh77agH0F6MTyUV7bsni99h/fpHYXKUtfP+XFxUgxHmGkdFrkWAxv14U5Q/5w9GwAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"2ddc8fb9886f0bc850bf211f3f68683d425b168f73961d9a8ef17c7941e34bac","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:43.957672Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:43.957672Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Population and Empirical PR Curves for Assessment of Ranking Algorithms","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Jacqueline M. Hughes-Oliver","submitted_at":"2018-10-19T18:29:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"The ROC curve is widely used to assess the quality of prediction/classification/ranking algorithms, and its properties have been extensively studied. The precision-recall (PR) curve has become the de facto replacement for the ROC curve in the presence of imbalance, namely where one class is far more likely than the other class. While the PR and ROC curves tend to be used interchangeably, they have some very different properties. Properties of the PR curve are the focus of this paper. We consider: (1) population PR curves, where complete distributional assumptions are specified for scores from "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1810.08635","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1810.08635","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:43.957753+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1810.08635v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:43.957753+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1810.08635","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:43.957753+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"FXOI7OMIN4F4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:25.280505+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:25.280505+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"FXOI7OMI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:32:25.280505+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.04377","citing_title":"A Hitchhiker's Guide to Understanding Performances of Two-Class Classifiers","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FXOI7OMI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/FXOI7OMI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1810.08635&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/FXOI7OMIN4F4QUF7EEPT62DIHV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:43.957753+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:02:43.957753+00:00"}