{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN","short_pith_number":"pith:G2HFCALS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"368e510172eff81bc13199803e97716365eaf6d066f1ff22ce1239d4a22f0a01","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2103.13868","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Haoxi Zhong, Maosong Sun, Shirong Ma, Tianyang Zhang, Yuzhong Wang, Zhiyuan Liu","submitted_at":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a legal system, judgment consistency is regarded as one of the most important manifestations of fairness. However, due to the complexity of factual elements that impact sentencing in real-world scenarios, few works have been done on quantitatively measuring judgment consistency towards real-world data. In this paper, we propose an evaluation metric for judgment inconsistency, Legal Inconsistency Coefficient (LInCo), which aims to evaluate inconsistency between data groups divided by specific features (e.g., gender, region, race). We propose to simulate judges from different groups with lega"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2103.13868","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"3775f5f01c80d7d794975267b3c27595761161a5672556f4d8e89842a0385752","abstract_canon_sha256":"d27e28e115b37c172fa86df5bbdd01daeacede41267b34a93d803e083aaf09d0"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.147159Z","signature_b64":"gQkvLScehSaKcjUwsh6QQ67NYJ0aX0GxXVXLrTNjrSquUZwczScw35CJjZ3qPYErSyky/IiXCQu1gosPSQDJBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"368e510172eff81bc13199803e97716365eaf6d066f1ff22ce1239d4a22f0a01","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146755Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146755Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chaojun Xiao, Cunchao Tu, Haoxi Zhong, Maosong Sun, Shirong Ma, Tianyang Zhang, Yuzhong Wang, Zhiyuan Liu","submitted_at":"2021-03-25T14:28:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"In a legal system, judgment consistency is regarded as one of the most important manifestations of fairness. However, due to the complexity of factual elements that impact sentencing in real-world scenarios, few works have been done on quantitatively measuring judgment consistency towards real-world data. In this paper, we propose an evaluation metric for judgment inconsistency, Legal Inconsistency Coefficient (LInCo), which aims to evaluate inconsistency between data groups divided by specific features (e.g., gender, region, race). We propose to simulate judges from different groups with lega"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2103.13868","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2103.13868/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2103.13868","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2103.13868v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2103.13868","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"G2HFCALS574B","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"G2HFCALS574BXQJR","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146813+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"G2HFCALS","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146813+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.13732","citing_title":"The Judge Variable: Challenging Judge-Agnostic Legal Judgment Prediction","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/G2HFCALS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/G2HFCALS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2103.13868&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/G2HFCALS574BXQJRTGAD5F3RMN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146813+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:26:23.146813+00:00"}