{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU","short_pith_number":"pith:G4WL243W","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"372cbd7376333910796fd979cff18d75017b9aef53b7a8b2cbabcdfe7c716770","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.03332","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"AI-Driven Scholarly Peer Review via Persistent Workflow Prompting, Meta-Prompting, and Meta-Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.chem-ph"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Evgeny Markhasin","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T09:06:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"Critical peer review of scientific manuscripts presents a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs), partly due to data limitations and the complexity of expert reasoning. This report introduces Persistent Workflow Prompting (PWP), a potentially broadly applicable prompt engineering methodology designed to bridge this gap using standard LLM chat interfaces (zero-code, no APIs). We present a proof-of-concept PWP prompt for the critical analysis of experimental chemistry manuscripts, featuring a hierarchical, modular architecture (structured via Markdown) that defines detailed analy"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.03332","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T09:06:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.chem-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"785a734ddd52929b55d465bcd48baaa880fcc4c70e8ca17e4deadd087a8e6aab","abstract_canon_sha256":"cc56066b354b8a8d8943a25374952ca0aae22b3248503fb48906487649ec887e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948626Z","signature_b64":"ixNA/TT2JMJgP0ROHkfHCAfw/SQY2uRv7g9SnkBsU8Fm5ej8E0Ut4Fi8AW1rEeH/cFndH4MjkDzq5Gv1yrQ4Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"372cbd7376333910796fd979cff18d75017b9aef53b7a8b2cbabcdfe7c716770","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948179Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948179Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"AI-Driven Scholarly Peer Review via Persistent Workflow Prompting, Meta-Prompting, and Meta-Reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.chem-ph"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Evgeny Markhasin","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T09:06:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"Critical peer review of scientific manuscripts presents a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs), partly due to data limitations and the complexity of expert reasoning. This report introduces Persistent Workflow Prompting (PWP), a potentially broadly applicable prompt engineering methodology designed to bridge this gap using standard LLM chat interfaces (zero-code, no APIs). We present a proof-of-concept PWP prompt for the critical analysis of experimental chemistry manuscripts, featuring a hierarchical, modular architecture (structured via Markdown) that defines detailed analy"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.03332","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.03332/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.03332","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.03332v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.03332","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"G4WL243WGM4R","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"G4WL243WGM4RA6LP","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"G4WL243W","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948235+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.25057","citing_title":"LLM-Based Scientific Peer Review: Methods, Benchmarks, and Reliability Challenges","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/G4WL243W"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/G4WL243W","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.03332&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/G4WL243WGM4RA6LP3F4474MNOU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948235+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:34:07.948235+00:00"}