{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7","short_pith_number":"pith:GAGYN3N6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"300d86edbed7a651c4af216c5823f797fef367a9330fe22bb36185f3485df4ca","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2411.15302","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"No manifest T-duality at order $\\alpha'^3$","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Ahmed Rakin Kamal, Linus Wulff, Steven Weilong Hsia","submitted_at":"2024-11-22T19:00:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"When reduced from $10$ to $10-d$ dimensions tree-level string theory exhibits an $O(d,d)$ symmetry. This symmetry, which is closely related to T-duality, appears only after certain field redefinitions. We find a simple form for a subset of these redefinitions at order $\\alpha'^3$ and show that they cannot be lifted to ten dimensions. This is inconsistent with ``manifestly T-duality invariant'' approaches such as generalized geometry (in the uncompactified setting). Such formulations therefore seem not to be the correct language to describe string theory."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2411.15302","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2024-11-22T19:00:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b39cf9e2cf076917f3f2070148fa584a6e5f177c3d64c54d7253349f7265028c","abstract_canon_sha256":"5a764a969dd188d63e3f9fa5191f9b49595f4043f6fcbedf066039a4b93d5f29"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.088158Z","signature_b64":"BRj7eZbDe8tTRj0bqdf2wYVcUlBVIoxIHJ8EEMVHXpoNAB2UbLx8DajQejaXUo5cdZ1FogtAGLtMSpQOyhUQBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"300d86edbed7a651c4af216c5823f797fef367a9330fe22bb36185f3485df4ca","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087524Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087524Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"No manifest T-duality at order $\\alpha'^3$","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Ahmed Rakin Kamal, Linus Wulff, Steven Weilong Hsia","submitted_at":"2024-11-22T19:00:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"When reduced from $10$ to $10-d$ dimensions tree-level string theory exhibits an $O(d,d)$ symmetry. This symmetry, which is closely related to T-duality, appears only after certain field redefinitions. We find a simple form for a subset of these redefinitions at order $\\alpha'^3$ and show that they cannot be lifted to ten dimensions. This is inconsistent with ``manifestly T-duality invariant'' approaches such as generalized geometry (in the uncompactified setting). Such formulations therefore seem not to be the correct language to describe string theory."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2411.15302","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2411.15302/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2411.15302","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2411.15302v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2411.15302","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GAGYN3N626TF","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GAGYN3N626TFDRFP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087621+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GAGYN3N6","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087621+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26280","citing_title":"A Circle That Won't Return: The Fate of RR Fluxes and D-branes in Type 0A Tachyon Condensation","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21447","citing_title":"$O(d,d)$ symmetric gravity and finite coupling holography","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21447","citing_title":"$O(d,d)$ symmetric gravity and finite coupling holography","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GAGYN3N6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GAGYN3N6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2411.15302&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GAGYN3N626TFDRFPEFWFQI7XS7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087621+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:44:20.087621+00:00"}