{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV","short_pith_number":"pith:GBN5XAOJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"305bdb81c9b0aa50ad0957182f9ece955fb245e8e4e687732f721c3ca49a5c1a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.06045","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Treatment effect extrapolation in the presence of unmeasured confounding","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Matthew Sperrin, Ricardo Silva, Stephanie Riley","submitted_at":"2025-09-07T13:13:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"While randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for estimating causal treatment effects, their limited sample sizes and restrictive criteria make it difficult to extrapolate to a broader population. Observational data, while larger, suffer from unmeasured confounding. Therefore, we can combine the strengths of both data sources for more accurate results.\n  This work extends existing methods that use RCTs to debias conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) estimated in observational data by defining a deconfounding function. Our proposed approach borrows information from RCT"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.06045","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2025-09-07T13:13:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"626ccb4e83371257a7cb1d5b6f1d52b7de18a19322870082c79517769c40d571","abstract_canon_sha256":"ffe2bc0c0e08bb892c3103ef9e17ec6f4104a5e745cc8d5a476e4a075ca4185c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.832441Z","signature_b64":"pJH2cOdG1j8NmLoyQQ0seSh7Z7EmUjtGxMBgBF7zBLxsI9iRFmYJjFKvEp7sBnCUPdOQcM4KrbmuFHteEkfMAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"305bdb81c9b0aa50ad0957182f9ece955fb245e8e4e687732f721c3ca49a5c1a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831878Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831878Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Treatment effect extrapolation in the presence of unmeasured confounding","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Matthew Sperrin, Ricardo Silva, Stephanie Riley","submitted_at":"2025-09-07T13:13:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"While randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for estimating causal treatment effects, their limited sample sizes and restrictive criteria make it difficult to extrapolate to a broader population. Observational data, while larger, suffer from unmeasured confounding. Therefore, we can combine the strengths of both data sources for more accurate results.\n  This work extends existing methods that use RCTs to debias conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) estimated in observational data by defining a deconfounding function. Our proposed approach borrows information from RCT"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.06045","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.06045/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.06045","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831938+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.06045v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831938+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.06045","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831938+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GBN5XAOJWCVF","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831938+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831938+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GBN5XAOJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831938+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GBN5XAOJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GBN5XAOJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.06045&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GBN5XAOJWCVFBLIJK4MC7HWOSV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831938+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:06:28.831938+00:00"}