{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2","short_pith_number":"pith:GCDGEAO5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"30866201ddfc17eab42dc164cef80caea0e045c94e0456bfcb16673a25404081","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.10574","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Detection Made Easy: Potentials of Large Language Models for Solidity Vulnerabilities","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.ET","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Abyayananda Maiti, Md Tauseef Alam, Raju Halder","submitted_at":"2024-09-15T13:16:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The large-scale deployment of Solidity smart contracts on the Ethereum mainnet has increasingly attracted financially-motivated attackers in recent years. A few now-infamous attacks in Ethereum's history includes DAO attack in 2016 (50 million dollars lost), Parity Wallet hack in 2017 (146 million dollars locked), Beautychain's token BEC in 2018 (900 million dollars market value fell to 0), and NFT gaming blockchain breach in 2022 ($600 million in Ether stolen). This paper presents a comprehensive investigation of the use of large language models (LLMs) and their capabilities in detecting OWAS"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.10574","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-09-15T13:16:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.ET","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"35996468f36361596f856ea5c2b962e3b6c3f5a1332646d8f57eeb35856284fb","abstract_canon_sha256":"cb84b0cdedcf27bbf7ce1edaffb97d88b6de391eb75c410617ebb145e48afaa8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.511485Z","signature_b64":"nLfNR2qru1Z8swvXLvejxvEU4njCserBezf7LdXxVs2NVL5XgmWFHXZGOFnQFkHNes6N772lSr545n1DiurQAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"30866201ddfc17eab42dc164cef80caea0e045c94e0456bfcb16673a25404081","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510884Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510884Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Detection Made Easy: Potentials of Large Language Models for Solidity Vulnerabilities","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.ET","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Abyayananda Maiti, Md Tauseef Alam, Raju Halder","submitted_at":"2024-09-15T13:16:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"The large-scale deployment of Solidity smart contracts on the Ethereum mainnet has increasingly attracted financially-motivated attackers in recent years. A few now-infamous attacks in Ethereum's history includes DAO attack in 2016 (50 million dollars lost), Parity Wallet hack in 2017 (146 million dollars locked), Beautychain's token BEC in 2018 (900 million dollars market value fell to 0), and NFT gaming blockchain breach in 2022 ($600 million in Ether stolen). This paper presents a comprehensive investigation of the use of large language models (LLMs) and their capabilities in detecting OWAS"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.10574","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.10574/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.10574","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.10574v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.10574","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GCDGEAO57QL6","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GCDGEAO57QL6VNBN","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510968+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GCDGEAO5","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510968+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.07049","citing_title":"LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GCDGEAO5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GCDGEAO5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.10574&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GCDGEAO57QL6VNBNYFSM56AMV2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510968+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:30.510968+00:00"}