{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN","short_pith_number":"pith:GD6EWABR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"30fc4b003106a3a6ee346cd03b41ee3373a0190d96d9b55bb285b46839ee1a11","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2201.08207","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Invasion Dynamics in the Biased Voter Process","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CC","cs.DS","cs.GT","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"q-bio.PE","authors_text":"Andreas Pavlogiannis, Josef Tkadlec, Loke Durocher, Panagiotis Karras","submitted_at":"2022-01-20T14:43:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"The voter process is a classic stochastic process that models the invasion of a mutant trait $A$ (e.g., a new opinion, belief, legend, genetic mutation, magnetic spin) in a population of agents (e.g., people, genes, particles) who share a resident trait $B$, spread over the nodes of a graph. An agent may adopt the trait of one of its neighbors at any time, while the invasion bias $r\\in(0,\\infty)$ quantifies the stochastic preference towards ($r>1$) or against ($r<1$) adopting $A$ over $B$. Success is measured in terms of the fixation probability, i.e., the probability that eventually all agent"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2201.08207","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"q-bio.PE","submitted_at":"2022-01-20T14:43:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CC","cs.DS","cs.GT","cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"c9ba24df6953cc4bdfc9f23060039178eaf542f7557137785cdeff729eec6d9a","abstract_canon_sha256":"18c464dfaf8f9ad5bca10dddaf194511c1f5dc6ee643913e74e1c4cab9856864"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494777Z","signature_b64":"GMJlf1mGoWM+1cPK3yKBDZ58jv7z9tsZ7DsDuw8m2Clkp6OMQb1MJmpuQtUqlaGT1D86Klsh6isJPsuLBZXCAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"30fc4b003106a3a6ee346cd03b41ee3373a0190d96d9b55bb285b46839ee1a11","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494232Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494232Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Invasion Dynamics in the Biased Voter Process","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CC","cs.DS","cs.GT","cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"q-bio.PE","authors_text":"Andreas Pavlogiannis, Josef Tkadlec, Loke Durocher, Panagiotis Karras","submitted_at":"2022-01-20T14:43:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"The voter process is a classic stochastic process that models the invasion of a mutant trait $A$ (e.g., a new opinion, belief, legend, genetic mutation, magnetic spin) in a population of agents (e.g., people, genes, particles) who share a resident trait $B$, spread over the nodes of a graph. An agent may adopt the trait of one of its neighbors at any time, while the invasion bias $r\\in(0,\\infty)$ quantifies the stochastic preference towards ($r>1$) or against ($r<1$) adopting $A$ over $B$. Success is measured in terms of the fixation probability, i.e., the probability that eventually all agent"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2201.08207","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2201.08207/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2201.08207","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2201.08207v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2201.08207","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GD6EWABRA2R2","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GD6EWABRA2R2N3RU","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494291+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GD6EWABR","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494291+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.10172","citing_title":"Modeling biases in binary decision-making within the generalized nonlinear q-voter model","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GD6EWABR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GD6EWABR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2201.08207&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GD6EWABRA2R2N3RUNTIDWQPOGN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494291+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:52.494291+00:00"}