{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU","short_pith_number":"pith:GGC2TLLA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3185a9ad60f7f9a61c951ad1def71fad3b8b23fc4279082e5cb9fc14c2dca964","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.01028","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When Bi-interpretability implies Synonymy","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Albert Visser, Harvey M. Friedman","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T14:16:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Two salient notions of sameness of theories are synonymy, also known as definitional equivalence, and bi-interpretability. Of these two definitional equivalence is the strictest notion. In which cases can we infer synonymy from bi-interpretability? We study this question for the case of sequential theories. Our result is as follows. Suppose that two sequential theories are bi-interpretable and that the interpretations involved in the bi-interpretation are one-dimensional and identity preserving. Then, the theories are synonymous.\n  The crucial ingredient of our proof is a version of the Schr\\\""},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.01028","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.LO","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T14:16:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"dc1fd066baa8ce3d1d6eccaa0dedba40764523528d961e4e4b9d2696627a0b20","abstract_canon_sha256":"97b3e7c7bfd1b4cd52b63cf7b87966def2873cc10683b7a18e2daf2894669305"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970922Z","signature_b64":"+2ydnZCqiOlhMWWO/kQzpJVfdMYN+cpo3jPgBzNZEW8cPWVVWU+fKLiSYMa353iGkjbFk8XXaH1GQEbLLIvaDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3185a9ad60f7f9a61c951ad1def71fad3b8b23fc4279082e5cb9fc14c2dca964","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970415Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970415Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When Bi-interpretability implies Synonymy","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"math.LO","authors_text":"Albert Visser, Harvey M. Friedman","submitted_at":"2025-06-01T14:16:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"Two salient notions of sameness of theories are synonymy, also known as definitional equivalence, and bi-interpretability. Of these two definitional equivalence is the strictest notion. In which cases can we infer synonymy from bi-interpretability? We study this question for the case of sequential theories. Our result is as follows. Suppose that two sequential theories are bi-interpretable and that the interpretations involved in the bi-interpretation are one-dimensional and identity preserving. Then, the theories are synonymous.\n  The crucial ingredient of our proof is a version of the Schr\\\""},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.01028","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.01028/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.01028","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970477+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.01028v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970477+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.01028","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970477+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GGC2TLLA6742","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970477+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GGC2TLLA6742MHEV","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970477+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GGC2TLLA","created_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970477+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GGC2TLLA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GGC2TLLA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.01028&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GGC2TLLA6742MHEVDLI555Y7VU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970477+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T12:03:26.970477+00:00"}