{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY","short_pith_number":"pith:GGIOLAPT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3190e581f3bb5a00467c94669541ec9e29563d9adce99c5b0811a6cdfd75eb02","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1712.05441","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Game-Theoretic Taxonomy and Survey of Defensive Deception for Cybersecurity and Privacy","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Edward Colbert, Jeffrey Pawlick, Quanyan Zhu","submitted_at":"2017-12-14T20:34:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Cyberattacks on both databases and critical infrastructure have threatened public and private sectors. Ubiquitous tracking and wearable computing have infringed upon privacy. Advocates and engineers have recently proposed using defensive deception as a means to leverage the information asymmetry typically enjoyed by attackers as a tool for defenders. The term deception, however, has been employed broadly and with a variety of meanings. In this paper, we survey 24 articles from 2008-2018 that use game theory to model defensive deception for cybersecurity and privacy. Then we propose a taxonomy "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1712.05441","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2017-12-14T20:34:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f50217979628c3a035846fc1e9b2fc1f589fd9c547d6194975cad5d2f1d60acd","abstract_canon_sha256":"cc214ed029356872c0949f8a296d37f7c4df3fee1270e65456f1b85fb5cc0654"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:45:24.421102Z","signature_b64":"mpIG/+ov0CpNPt600kXfF9bIV8Js0+2HoUqF0a1rEKB3Fj6oj7MbV4heT3j6vS7bchVgZsGXCXrc4YdyE8/vBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3190e581f3bb5a00467c94669541ec9e29563d9adce99c5b0811a6cdfd75eb02","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:45:24.420598Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:45:24.420598Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Game-Theoretic Taxonomy and Survey of Defensive Deception for Cybersecurity and Privacy","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Edward Colbert, Jeffrey Pawlick, Quanyan Zhu","submitted_at":"2017-12-14T20:34:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"Cyberattacks on both databases and critical infrastructure have threatened public and private sectors. Ubiquitous tracking and wearable computing have infringed upon privacy. Advocates and engineers have recently proposed using defensive deception as a means to leverage the information asymmetry typically enjoyed by attackers as a tool for defenders. The term deception, however, has been employed broadly and with a variety of meanings. In this paper, we survey 24 articles from 2008-2018 that use game theory to model defensive deception for cybersecurity and privacy. Then we propose a taxonomy "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1712.05441","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1712.05441","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:45:24.420682+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1712.05441v3","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:45:24.420682+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1712.05441","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:45:24.420682+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GGIOLAPTXNNA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:15.632608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GGIOLAPTXNNAART4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:15.632608+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GGIOLAPT","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:15.632608+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.01396","citing_title":"Strategic Learning for Active, Adaptive, and Autonomous Cyber Defense","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GGIOLAPT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GGIOLAPT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1712.05441&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GGIOLAPTXNNAART4SRTJKQPMTY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:45:24.420682+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:45:24.420682+00:00"}