{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS","short_pith_number":"pith:GJEGMZBM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"324866642c8b1b13be4bb3b6b703dc34be60d9cbab154025cc238df9fb651468","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.20850","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Both Direct and Indirect Evidence Contribute to Dative Alternation Preferences in Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kanishka Misra, Kyle Mahowald, Leonie Weissweiler, Qing Yao","submitted_at":"2025-03-26T17:32:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Language models (LMs) tend to show human-like preferences on a number of syntactic phenomena, but the extent to which these are attributable to direct exposure to the phenomena or more general properties of language is unclear. We explore this with the English dative alternation (DO: \"gave Y the X\" vs. PO: \"gave the X to Y\"), using a controlled rearing paradigm wherein we iteratively train small LMs on systematically manipulated input. We focus on two properties that affect the choice of alternant: length and animacy. Both properties are directly present in datives but also reflect more global"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.20850","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-03-26T17:32:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"862ca0f41f92de8641da3a2eb182c8bb1393732b17dca3b3f46f0a747fba7d21","abstract_canon_sha256":"69ec06891afa2bb17e3392b01bdd84d4671073bf0f91965d8c9a32e391138fe4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500482Z","signature_b64":"qHk6AN+7qEERHpiA1uYNuyBXYF7lXLUldfHuloaOQjNfbJlAve8Mft20BAiZar+wAWSrtLH46iTYPNVDw6PhBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"324866642c8b1b13be4bb3b6b703dc34be60d9cbab154025cc238df9fb651468","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.499979Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.499979Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Both Direct and Indirect Evidence Contribute to Dative Alternation Preferences in Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Kanishka Misra, Kyle Mahowald, Leonie Weissweiler, Qing Yao","submitted_at":"2025-03-26T17:32:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Language models (LMs) tend to show human-like preferences on a number of syntactic phenomena, but the extent to which these are attributable to direct exposure to the phenomena or more general properties of language is unclear. We explore this with the English dative alternation (DO: \"gave Y the X\" vs. PO: \"gave the X to Y\"), using a controlled rearing paradigm wherein we iteratively train small LMs on systematically manipulated input. We focus on two properties that affect the choice of alternant: length and animacy. Both properties are directly present in datives but also reflect more global"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.20850","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.20850/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.20850","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500037+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.20850v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500037+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.20850","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500037+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GJEGMZBMRMNR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500037+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSL","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500037+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GJEGMZBM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500037+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12225","citing_title":"On the Interpretability of Whisper Encodings Using Sparse Autoencoders","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GJEGMZBM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GJEGMZBM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.20850&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GJEGMZBMRMNRHPSLWO3LOA64GS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500037+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:51:24.500037+00:00"}