{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL","short_pith_number":"pith:GJVAQED4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"326a08107cb63a7c300fe224ebe2fdaae630fa63e088de8fcf606c1b4793287a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1702.01126","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Inconsistency in the ordinal pairwise comparisons method with and without ties","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DM","authors_text":"Konrad Ku{\\l}akowski","submitted_at":"2017-02-03T19:13:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Comparing alternatives in pairs is a well-known method of ranking creation. Experts are asked to perform a series of binary comparisons and then, using mathematical methods, the final ranking is prepared. As experts conduct the individual assessments, they may not always be consistent. The level of inconsistency among individual assessments is widely accepted as a measure of the ranking quality. The higher the ranking quality, the greater its credibility. One way to determine the level of inconsistency among the paired comparisons is to calculate the value of the inconsistency index. One of th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1702.01126","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DM","submitted_at":"2017-02-03T19:13:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4ffef1ba25be7fe95171acde9745d8020f0f42654040da82a509de3e0ec2496b","abstract_canon_sha256":"9540a19c6804144d974f12d9db8736f20fca72e691c8cc1f3cfa33edbd343111"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:58:42.547451Z","signature_b64":"gyDW2kWJ4DwIN7LMV87dAKTU22/D6D2R5g/9vWyLYfDu1s3FnVRqIHmkdg221wNO2qySA8tj8mQdbDUlTz5fDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"326a08107cb63a7c300fe224ebe2fdaae630fa63e088de8fcf606c1b4793287a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:58:42.546831Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:58:42.546831Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Inconsistency in the ordinal pairwise comparisons method with and without ties","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DM","authors_text":"Konrad Ku{\\l}akowski","submitted_at":"2017-02-03T19:13:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Comparing alternatives in pairs is a well-known method of ranking creation. Experts are asked to perform a series of binary comparisons and then, using mathematical methods, the final ranking is prepared. As experts conduct the individual assessments, they may not always be consistent. The level of inconsistency among individual assessments is widely accepted as a measure of the ranking quality. The higher the ranking quality, the greater its credibility. One way to determine the level of inconsistency among the paired comparisons is to calculate the value of the inconsistency index. One of th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1702.01126","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1702.01126","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:58:42.546921+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1702.01126v3","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:58:42.546921+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1702.01126","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:58:42.546921+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GJVAQED4WY5H","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:18.294218+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:18.294218+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GJVAQED4","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:18.294218+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GJVAQED4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GJVAQED4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1702.01126&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GJVAQED4WY5HYMAP4ISOXYX5VL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:58:42.546921+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:58:42.546921+00:00"}