{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD","short_pith_number":"pith:GLEY3MU5","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"32c98db29d7d9b6ee7ad81a4f03a3228ea4effa1c3d7802d1937f93350008735","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.12332","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Perceptions of the Fairness Impacts of Multiplicity in Machine Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Anna P. Meyer, Aws Albarghouthi, Loris D'Antoni, Yea-Seul Kim","submitted_at":"2024-09-18T21:57:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in high-stakes settings, yet multiplicity - the existence of multiple good models - means that some predictions are essentially arbitrary. ML researchers and philosophers posit that multiplicity poses a fairness risk, but no studies have investigated whether stakeholders agree. In this work, we conduct a survey to see how multiplicity impacts lay stakeholders' - i.e., decision subjects' - perceptions of ML fairness, and which approaches to address multiplicity they prefer. We investigate how these perceptions are modulated by task characteristics (e.g"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.12332","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2024-09-18T21:57:51Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"6e26ad1e479bccc277ebe2001f53c22ba63600932ea6d2619bfc5940698c43b3","abstract_canon_sha256":"8308e7ee146bae479db2750b396f8fff1d03ee9ad33776a3199f24e82155a001"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.603077Z","signature_b64":"z2IIAsCgANz2S2AHieDPV2eVUDPlSo8hMPRJaRQ/9pHtLQHTOf55UbeVM8TWG/YlTrfiWkfdNCZsxS6DsnA2Dw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"32c98db29d7d9b6ee7ad81a4f03a3228ea4effa1c3d7802d1937f93350008735","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602618Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602618Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Perceptions of the Fairness Impacts of Multiplicity in Machine Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Anna P. Meyer, Aws Albarghouthi, Loris D'Antoni, Yea-Seul Kim","submitted_at":"2024-09-18T21:57:51Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in high-stakes settings, yet multiplicity - the existence of multiple good models - means that some predictions are essentially arbitrary. ML researchers and philosophers posit that multiplicity poses a fairness risk, but no studies have investigated whether stakeholders agree. In this work, we conduct a survey to see how multiplicity impacts lay stakeholders' - i.e., decision subjects' - perceptions of ML fairness, and which approaches to address multiplicity they prefer. We investigate how these perceptions are modulated by task characteristics (e.g"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.12332","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.12332/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.12332","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.12332v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.12332","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GLEY3MU5PWNW","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5N","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GLEY3MU5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602681+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.14959","citing_title":"Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learning","ref_index":2022,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GLEY3MU5"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GLEY3MU5","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.12332&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GLEY3MU5PWNW5Z5NQGSPAORSFD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602681+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:04:17.602681+00:00"}