{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2","short_pith_number":"pith:GMTIZZK6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"33268ce55ebfe42520f149ea8460a5beb299167aac18aa392e314d216773a795","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2212.10057","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"WeCheck: Strong Factual Consistency Checker via Weakly Supervised Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jiachen Liu, Sujian Li, Wei Li, Wenhao Wu, Xinyan Xiao, Yajuan Lv","submitted_at":"2022-12-20T08:04:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"A crucial issue of current text generation models is that they often uncontrollably generate factually inconsistent text with respective of their inputs. Limited by the lack of annotated data, existing works in evaluating factual consistency directly transfer the reasoning ability of models trained on other data-rich upstream tasks like question answering (QA) and natural language inference (NLI) without any further adaptation. As a result, they perform poorly on the real generated text and are biased heavily by their single-source upstream tasks. To alleviate this problem, we propose a weakly"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2212.10057","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-12-20T08:04:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d9c1279c5f5c67be8c877dfbfc5737102d9508f000862f07761fa19f98af7f22","abstract_canon_sha256":"00c5282d1e60286381787ad34f50c397479f85a0c260fb07da03c4777016b296"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098833Z","signature_b64":"deXAw3m+/AzkGtZOFT5kTBvlxWv9Tzjv2w12K5n51puF7jg+JKBS7YyJIbs/lbKPntNiooKDDBV4f6PIKYxECw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"33268ce55ebfe42520f149ea8460a5beb299167aac18aa392e314d216773a795","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098299Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098299Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"WeCheck: Strong Factual Consistency Checker via Weakly Supervised Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Jiachen Liu, Sujian Li, Wei Li, Wenhao Wu, Xinyan Xiao, Yajuan Lv","submitted_at":"2022-12-20T08:04:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"A crucial issue of current text generation models is that they often uncontrollably generate factually inconsistent text with respective of their inputs. Limited by the lack of annotated data, existing works in evaluating factual consistency directly transfer the reasoning ability of models trained on other data-rich upstream tasks like question answering (QA) and natural language inference (NLI) without any further adaptation. As a result, they perform poorly on the real generated text and are biased heavily by their single-source upstream tasks. To alleviate this problem, we propose a weakly"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2212.10057","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2212.10057/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2212.10057","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098372+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2212.10057v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098372+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2212.10057","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098372+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GMTIZZK6X7SC","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098372+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHR","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098372+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GMTIZZK6","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098372+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.15771","citing_title":"ORION Grounded in Context: Retrieval-Based Method for Hallucination Detection","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GMTIZZK6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GMTIZZK6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2212.10057&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GMTIZZK6X7SCKIHRJHVIIYFFX2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098372+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:14:39.098372+00:00"}