{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5","short_pith_number":"pith:GNY3SHFQ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3371b91cb0a6d9e22df70e6a2d1da94f67d9e72bd8638c1d90c98bd9827c6d15","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2107.08054","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The reach of next-to-leading-order perturbation theory for the matter bispectrum","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Andrea Oddo, Andrei Lazanu, Cristiano Porciani, Davit Alkhanishvili, Emiliano Sefusatti, Matteo Biagetti, Victoria Yankelevich","submitted_at":"2021-07-16T18:00:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"We provide a comparison between the matter bispectrum derived with different flavours of perturbation theory at next-to-leading order and measurements from an unprecedentedly large suite of $N$-body simulations. We use the $\\chi^2$ goodness-of-fit test to determine the range of accuracy of the models as a function of the volume covered by subsets of the simulations. We find that models based on the effective-field-theory (EFT) approach have the largest reach, standard perturbation theory has the shortest, and `classical' resummed schemes lie in between. The gain from EFT, however, is less than"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2107.08054","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2021-07-16T18:00:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f220b5db5822fd4875c267ec07a8bc83acbc121a5c7777929f8d34291b280d19","abstract_canon_sha256":"a1ec70e3266bceb2b022d2a78c9c33c1ee7e97cdcd2bfcdb451b28bf2424f287"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.077116Z","signature_b64":"VRNfuW4auIZm+jv9vg3iEDNTaWbeTtKK3OZcGLDEPYbWt5raBpAbuw7jzkT+hov3JGsqH3vXoCzTWmvPQCDODA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3371b91cb0a6d9e22df70e6a2d1da94f67d9e72bd8638c1d90c98bd9827c6d15","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076639Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076639Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The reach of next-to-leading-order perturbation theory for the matter bispectrum","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Andrea Oddo, Andrei Lazanu, Cristiano Porciani, Davit Alkhanishvili, Emiliano Sefusatti, Matteo Biagetti, Victoria Yankelevich","submitted_at":"2021-07-16T18:00:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"We provide a comparison between the matter bispectrum derived with different flavours of perturbation theory at next-to-leading order and measurements from an unprecedentedly large suite of $N$-body simulations. We use the $\\chi^2$ goodness-of-fit test to determine the range of accuracy of the models as a function of the volume covered by subsets of the simulations. We find that models based on the effective-field-theory (EFT) approach have the largest reach, standard perturbation theory has the shortest, and `classical' resummed schemes lie in between. The gain from EFT, however, is less than"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2107.08054","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2107.08054/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2107.08054","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2107.08054v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2107.08054","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GNY3SHFQU3M6","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPX","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076691+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GNY3SHFQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076691+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.05378","citing_title":"Equivalence of the field-level inference and conventional analyses on large scales","ref_index":85,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GNY3SHFQ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GNY3SHFQ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2107.08054&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GNY3SHFQU3M6ELPXBZVC2HNJJ5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076691+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:03:49.076691+00:00"}