{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26","short_pith_number":"pith:GOL7D3FN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3397f1ecade5dc186b0b4d77be9891d7b358bccac53cb62ddbf28947d1ed1d6c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1909.09001","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"CogniVal: A Framework for Cognitive Word Embedding Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Antonio de la Torre, Ce Zhang, Nicolas Langer, Nora Hollenstein","submitted_at":"2019-09-19T13:57:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"An interesting method of evaluating word representations is by how much they reflect the semantic representations in the human brain. However, most, if not all, previous works only focus on small datasets and a single modality. In this paper, we present the first multi-modal framework for evaluating English word representations based on cognitive lexical semantics. Six types of word embeddings are evaluated by fitting them to 15 datasets of eye-tracking, EEG and fMRI signals recorded during language processing. To achieve a global score over all evaluation hypotheses, we apply statistical sign"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1909.09001","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2019-09-19T13:57:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e1dcefe0d35f2fd9ce954216343aeece123cfc3005e6b2172dd85667c050c6de","abstract_canon_sha256":"6efa70e2ab8c8e4c81e1b1bf73946193bd68486405c3580dcf9a2c3945c73eda"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628419Z","signature_b64":"tmvRQ2DdVAmJQSHwbcCLeuKJ6KYq2rJvs6bUjEhEnH69WndhafrOLFXnjlgbxUrcwqn9Avfs9BmBUARqDhEXDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3397f1ecade5dc186b0b4d77be9891d7b358bccac53cb62ddbf28947d1ed1d6c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628067Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628067Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"CogniVal: A Framework for Cognitive Word Embedding Evaluation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Antonio de la Torre, Ce Zhang, Nicolas Langer, Nora Hollenstein","submitted_at":"2019-09-19T13:57:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"An interesting method of evaluating word representations is by how much they reflect the semantic representations in the human brain. However, most, if not all, previous works only focus on small datasets and a single modality. In this paper, we present the first multi-modal framework for evaluating English word representations based on cognitive lexical semantics. Six types of word embeddings are evaluated by fitting them to 15 datasets of eye-tracking, EEG and fMRI signals recorded during language processing. To achieve a global score over all evaluation hypotheses, we apply statistical sign"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1909.09001","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1909.09001/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1909.09001","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628122+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1909.09001v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628122+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1909.09001","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628122+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GOL7D3FN4XOB","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628122+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YL","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628122+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GOL7D3FN","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628122+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.04936","citing_title":"Probing the contents of semantic representations from text, behavior, and brain data using the psychNorms metabase","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GOL7D3FN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GOL7D3FN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1909.09001&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GOL7D3FN4XOBQ2YLJV335GER26/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628122+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:23:07.628122+00:00"}