{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI","short_pith_number":"pith:GOWI7K5U","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"33ac8fabb44ad7dc77161c486f40f61a12d166221820ffdeac22872cc27d3c80","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2504.09681","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Improved null tests of $\\Lambda$CDM and FLRW in light of DESI DR2","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Bikash R. Dinda, Chris Clarkson, Roy Maartens, Shun Saito","submitted_at":"2025-04-13T18:21:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"The DESI DR2 BAO data, in combination with CMB and different SNIa datasets, exclude the flat $\\Lambda$CDM model at more than 2.5$\\sigma$ when analyzed through the $w_0w_a$CDM parametrization for evolving dark energy. This simple parametrization may not accurately capture the behavior of the entire redshift range at late times, which may introduce bias in the results. We use null tests that probe for deviations from flat $\\Lambda$CDM at late times, independent of any specific dark energy parametrization. We provide several diagnostics for null tests and discuss their advantages and disadvantage"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2504.09681","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2025-04-13T18:21:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc"],"title_canon_sha256":"7086c2270a2d202683f0e7b030ed6dbfce95526fa06703357267456de9fc7259","abstract_canon_sha256":"ed9d12cb732dacbdcd2a69523625a6ee4f28c1d1de69678f5e285fd7987b2672"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835741Z","signature_b64":"OnzW9DXjh75K3A/IGdnYKbTirBM1+VRJkq/1CAAFL9B00ccwDKW2G2joDrRuv8WFGo1AC/okQoV4eMOEqcGUCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"33ac8fabb44ad7dc77161c486f40f61a12d166221820ffdeac22872cc27d3c80","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835242Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835242Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Improved null tests of $\\Lambda$CDM and FLRW in light of DESI DR2","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Bikash R. Dinda, Chris Clarkson, Roy Maartens, Shun Saito","submitted_at":"2025-04-13T18:21:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"The DESI DR2 BAO data, in combination with CMB and different SNIa datasets, exclude the flat $\\Lambda$CDM model at more than 2.5$\\sigma$ when analyzed through the $w_0w_a$CDM parametrization for evolving dark energy. This simple parametrization may not accurately capture the behavior of the entire redshift range at late times, which may introduce bias in the results. We use null tests that probe for deviations from flat $\\Lambda$CDM at late times, independent of any specific dark energy parametrization. We provide several diagnostics for null tests and discuss their advantages and disadvantage"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2504.09681","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2504.09681/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2504.09681","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2504.09681v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2504.09681","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GOWI7K5UJLL5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YW","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GOWI7K5U","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835297+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13546","citing_title":"No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.23248","citing_title":"The Generalized Second Law and the Spatial Curvature Index","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13546","citing_title":"No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07244","citing_title":"Observational Tests for Distinguishing Classes of Cosmological Models","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05836","citing_title":"Diagnostic Consistency Tests of the Concordance Cosmology","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.05822","citing_title":"Model-independent constraints on generalized FLRW consistency relations with bootstrap-based symbolic regression","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GOWI7K5U"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GOWI7K5U","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2504.09681&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GOWI7K5UJLL5Y5YWDREG6QHWDI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835297+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:34.835297+00:00"}