{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ","short_pith_number":"pith:GP6CSRLU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"33fc294574ddc3d9742edbcd39bf804c17f28cb55f34834ad44bbf7ea7c6d5bf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2207.05943","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Two-stage differences in differences","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"John Gardner","submitted_at":"2022-07-13T03:44:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"A recent literature has shown that when adoption of a treatment is staggered and average treatment effects vary across groups and over time, difference-in-differences regression does not identify an easily interpretable measure of the typical effect of the treatment. In this paper, I extend this literature in two ways. First, I provide some simple underlying intuition for why difference-in-differences regression does not identify a group$\\times$period average treatment effect. Second, I propose an alternative two-stage estimation framework, motivated by this intuition. In this framework, group"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2207.05943","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2022-07-13T03:44:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"abd6de15d881c5e37e4395f2588cc1bf75eb47ec9c4f0062cc38053458ab3cc1","abstract_canon_sha256":"cca1e6e8323a6c5f98901d0200729fc87615e1c61a064d74c1736c637b0fe188"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149788Z","signature_b64":"B9xYAfEhf7UWaSF8/LenoATlZbhI/ZLL5BSiXnvvJhO/umXJqWAw6ALdZpzcGZgVvsHAIUHseql97fOd/J+yDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"33fc294574ddc3d9742edbcd39bf804c17f28cb55f34834ad44bbf7ea7c6d5bf","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149323Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149323Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Two-stage differences in differences","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"John Gardner","submitted_at":"2022-07-13T03:44:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"A recent literature has shown that when adoption of a treatment is staggered and average treatment effects vary across groups and over time, difference-in-differences regression does not identify an easily interpretable measure of the typical effect of the treatment. In this paper, I extend this literature in two ways. First, I provide some simple underlying intuition for why difference-in-differences regression does not identify a group$\\times$period average treatment effect. Second, I propose an alternative two-stage estimation framework, motivated by this intuition. In this framework, group"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2207.05943","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2207.05943/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2207.05943","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149382+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2207.05943v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149382+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2207.05943","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149382+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GP6CSRLU3XB5","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149382+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149382+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GP6CSRLU","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149382+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07524","citing_title":"Robust Inference for Weighted Estimands","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.17977","citing_title":"Beyond Parallel Trends in Staggered Difference-in-Differences: Identification under Higher-Order Parallelism","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.27035","citing_title":"Doubly robust local projections difference-in-differences","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GP6CSRLU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GP6CSRLU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2207.05943&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GP6CSRLU3XB5S5BO3PGTTP4AJQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149382+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:39:53.149382+00:00"}