{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ","short_pith_number":"pith:GPRT3IVJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"33e33da2a927308c8ccd71553d6a738c2fe9e53f8b9c4e88dcddcf25727b14f8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2503.22529","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"To CPL, or not to CPL? What we have not learned about the dark energy equation of state","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Glenn D. Starkman, Savvas Nesseris, Yashar Akrami","submitted_at":"2025-03-28T15:32:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"We show that using a Taylor expansion for the dark energy equation-of-state parameter and limiting it to the zeroth and first-order terms, i.e., the so-called Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization in regimes where it has been shown to fail as a physics-based two-parameter model, instead of allowing for higher-order terms and then marginalizing over them, adds extra information not present in the data and leads to markedly different and potentially misleading conclusions. Fixing the higher-order terms to zero, one concludes that vacuum energy that is currently non-dynamical (e.g., th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2503.22529","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2025-03-28T15:32:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"2fd7905b786f352296f443e21a647c593e903cafbe1f622171bacd9413cfd1da","abstract_canon_sha256":"0946b95835c7b3998703bc512021a58057f8d329aac8a8570735d5641da86c99"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072915Z","signature_b64":"CzK3FTiGeHkuwdBWHQkrUAQU0+3A+eO96UfKjNf1sRUm2k4/Lx4wVz4sj5swxWjsZ/KKo/SfsAB0aFG2PeByDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"33e33da2a927308c8ccd71553d6a738c2fe9e53f8b9c4e88dcddcf25727b14f8","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072427Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072427Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"To CPL, or not to CPL? What we have not learned about the dark energy equation of state","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-ph","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Glenn D. Starkman, Savvas Nesseris, Yashar Akrami","submitted_at":"2025-03-28T15:32:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"We show that using a Taylor expansion for the dark energy equation-of-state parameter and limiting it to the zeroth and first-order terms, i.e., the so-called Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization in regimes where it has been shown to fail as a physics-based two-parameter model, instead of allowing for higher-order terms and then marginalizing over them, adds extra information not present in the data and leads to markedly different and potentially misleading conclusions. Fixing the higher-order terms to zero, one concludes that vacuum energy that is currently non-dynamical (e.g., th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2503.22529","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2503.22529/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2503.22529","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2503.22529v2","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2503.22529","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GPRT3IVJE4YI","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGN","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072486+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GPRT3IVJ","created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072486+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":11,"internal_anchor_count":11,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13546","citing_title":"No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.24732","citing_title":"The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2","ref_index":121,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.13302","citing_title":"Comparing Minimal and Non-Minimal Quintessence Models to 2025 DESI Data","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.03779","citing_title":"Beyond CPL: Evidence for dynamical dark energy in three-parameter models","ref_index":90,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.18657","citing_title":"How Complex is Dark Energy? A Bayesian Analysis of CPL Extensions with Recent DESI BAO Measurements","ref_index":48,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.20757","citing_title":"Reanalyzing DESI DR1: 2. Constraints on Dark Energy, Spatial Curvature, and Neutrino Masses","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.07398","citing_title":"Study of the cosmological tensions and DESI-DR2 in the framework of the Little Rip model","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.11377","citing_title":"A class of decelerating inhomogeneous cosmological models giving rise to accelerating FLRW universes at large scales","ref_index":56,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.26560","citing_title":"Exploring the interplay of late-time dynamical dark energy and new physics before recombination","ref_index":153,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13546","citing_title":"No evidence for phantom crossing: local goodness-of-fit improvements do not persist under global Bayesian model comparison","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.03167","citing_title":"Mapping the redshift drift at various redshifts through cosmography","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GPRT3IVJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GPRT3IVJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2503.22529&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GPRT3IVJE4YIZDGNOFKT22TTRQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072486+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-09T01:05:06.072486+00:00"}