{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA","short_pith_number":"pith:GPXHPTUP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"33ee77ce8f30334ac50aa5dae1f100003c6696a014aea6a53ec68a9dc7ab1a55","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2301.12736","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"On Second-Order Scoring Rules for Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Eyke H\\\"ullermeier, Viktor Bengs, Willem Waegeman","submitted_at":"2023-01-30T08:59:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is well known that accurate probabilistic predictors can be trained through empirical risk minimisation with proper scoring rules as loss functions. While such learners capture so-called aleatoric uncertainty of predictions, various machine learning methods have recently been developed with the goal to let the learner also represent its epistemic uncertainty, i.e., the uncertainty caused by a lack of knowledge and data. An emerging branch of the literature proposes the use of a second-order learner that provides predictions in terms of distributions on probability distributions. However, re"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2301.12736","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2023-01-30T08:59:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"b034ed07ae9a2db2fb7d0a9bdf58be9a218fb17fe69caee7d91c2359236ed9e3","abstract_canon_sha256":"caec72597a1bfae0850c213adc31cb4a8d6be0da5d5940ff3a6b8380c0ba5b64"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232994Z","signature_b64":"Wc7MrHjGip7BQT/tbkkjDHWu9fYx4iuqHclSOeJacUaejGUdC9007z81et9BCVCkfGCbDiFrBwiFSpTR158iCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"33ee77ce8f30334ac50aa5dae1f100003c6696a014aea6a53ec68a9dc7ab1a55","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232525Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232525Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"On Second-Order Scoring Rules for Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Eyke H\\\"ullermeier, Viktor Bengs, Willem Waegeman","submitted_at":"2023-01-30T08:59:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is well known that accurate probabilistic predictors can be trained through empirical risk minimisation with proper scoring rules as loss functions. While such learners capture so-called aleatoric uncertainty of predictions, various machine learning methods have recently been developed with the goal to let the learner also represent its epistemic uncertainty, i.e., the uncertainty caused by a lack of knowledge and data. An emerging branch of the literature proposes the use of a second-order learner that provides predictions in terms of distributions on probability distributions. However, re"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2301.12736","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2301.12736/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2301.12736","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232581+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2301.12736v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232581+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2301.12736","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232581+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GPXHPTUPGAZU","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232581+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIK","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232581+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GPXHPTUP","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232581+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.20732","citing_title":"Joint Scoring Rules: Zero-Sum Competition Avoids Performative Prediction","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GPXHPTUP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GPXHPTUP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2301.12736&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GPXHPTUPGAZUVRIKUXNOD4IAAA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232581+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:36:57.232581+00:00"}