{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX","short_pith_number":"pith:GVMIFEKG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3558829146425f41250d82fb130f4fa5d3203d62205654a295f24967b696a8d0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.08918","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Beyond the Calibration Point: Mechanism Comparison in Differential Privacy","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG","math.ST","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Borja Balle, Daniel Rueckert, Georgios Kaissis, Jamie Hayes, Stefan Kolek","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T08:30:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"In differentially private (DP) machine learning, the privacy guarantees of DP mechanisms are often reported and compared on the basis of a single $(\\varepsilon, \\delta)$-pair. This practice overlooks that DP guarantees can vary substantially even between mechanisms sharing a given $(\\varepsilon, \\delta)$, and potentially introduces privacy vulnerabilities which can remain undetected. This motivates the need for robust, rigorous methods for comparing DP guarantees in such cases. Here, we introduce the $\\Delta$-divergence between mechanisms which quantifies the worst-case excess privacy vulnerab"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.08918","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T08:30:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG","math.ST","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"a4d0000ff8662a5a65e8e3c597fdba1f2b67d9feca2bb31103413cb1db6d8e3b","abstract_canon_sha256":"e9b779b085b6948e9875bfc445e213a02d0ef8ebb5120049add64c91e752aec7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640620Z","signature_b64":"eU9zV9J32PxkR2QdIEbBu8742XeYkTJiWvEDow96TjOaXIxKfgTKlG90zT7Jw5bPYDiIOU31HS0bOO5WjJG4Cw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3558829146425f41250d82fb130f4fa5d3203d62205654a295f24967b696a8d0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640107Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640107Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Beyond the Calibration Point: Mechanism Comparison in Differential Privacy","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG","math.ST","stat.ML","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Borja Balle, Daniel Rueckert, Georgios Kaissis, Jamie Hayes, Stefan Kolek","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T08:30:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"In differentially private (DP) machine learning, the privacy guarantees of DP mechanisms are often reported and compared on the basis of a single $(\\varepsilon, \\delta)$-pair. This practice overlooks that DP guarantees can vary substantially even between mechanisms sharing a given $(\\varepsilon, \\delta)$, and potentially introduces privacy vulnerabilities which can remain undetected. This motivates the need for robust, rigorous methods for comparing DP guarantees in such cases. Here, we introduce the $\\Delta$-divergence between mechanisms which quantifies the worst-case excess privacy vulnerab"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.08918","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.08918/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.08918","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640176+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.08918v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640176+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.08918","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640176+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GVMIFEKGIJPU","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640176+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GVMIFEKGIJPUCJIN","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640176+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GVMIFEKG","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640176+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15648","citing_title":"Rethinking the Security of DP-SGD: A Corrected Analysis of Differentially Private Machine Learning","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GVMIFEKG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GVMIFEKG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.08918&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GVMIFEKGIJPUCJINQL5RGD2PUX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640176+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:58:16.640176+00:00"}